by Rhys The Royal » 18 Oct 2006 19:09
by lozz2601 » 18 Oct 2006 19:18
by thefruits » 18 Oct 2006 19:21
by Platypuss » 18 Oct 2006 19:25
thefruits Reading's response yesterday was forensic, methodical and shame-inducing for any right-thinking Chelsea fan. Mourinho traded in emotion, Reading stuck to the facts.
Which approach do you prefer?
by Reading Abbey » 18 Oct 2006 19:39
by Lieutenant Pigeon » 18 Oct 2006 19:45
by rfc_prem2006 » 18 Oct 2006 23:26
by Arch » 19 Oct 2006 03:48
Kevin Nolan's column is usually drivel (compared with his predecessor Jason roberts who could often be quite insightful.) But this strikes exactly the right note. It's humane and down to earth - a good professional's view. I particularly approve of how he avoids making inflammatory remarks about Mourinho even though he quite clearly believes the guy has been a total cock about this.rfc_prem2006 Kevin Nolans view on events....
fellow professional sticks up for Hunt, Chelsea can just keep digging that already massive hole of theirs!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/6061928.stm
by Man Friday » 19 Oct 2006 12:25
by M4 Junction 11 » 19 Oct 2006 12:32
The FA there will be no disciplinary action taken against Stephen Hunt - reported on Sky News
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 354 guests