West Stand ManMmmMonsterMunch I must be missing something here..........
I actually thought we played rather well in the 1st half. If some of the final balls had been more accurate we could've had the game won by HT. Thought Karacan & Hunt were outstanding 1st half.
Admittedly 2nd half we weren't so good but I certainly didn't think it was bad. Antonio put a decent shift & Gorkss was immense as always.
Strange.
Other than not being prepared to go as far as 'outstanding' for Karacan and Hunt, I agree with this. They were, however, pretty good throughout. Gorkss continues to impress - he was an excellent buy.
Antonio put in a pretty good shift. He has pace and the ability to get in behind defenders, his final ball was lacking though and that is something that will improve with experience. How we went in 0-0 at half time defeats me. We carved them apart for 44 1/2 minutes (I've allowed them 30 seconds for the long free kick that looked goal bound). How the Pearce chance at the back post failed to go in will haunt me and him for a long time. Having said that, it was the longest 45 minutes of football I have seen for while, seriously lacking in sustained excitement.
Second half wasn't much better from an excitement perspective and Hull cam back into it. They were still much the worse of the sides, but the fight was more obvious. My initial reaction for the goal was that McLean was well offside but Brady was just on. How it is deemed 'not interfering with play' when a player chases the ball down and gets to within a couple of mm of touching it (with intent) I do not know.If the current directive to referees is that the player has to touch the ball then we could see some interesting scenarios (offside players in front of the keeper nor being called in future for instance).
We will also see play allowed to continue for ages as a clearly offside player chases after a ball for twenty yards, just in case he changes his mind at the very last moment, stops and lets a team mate take over!