Anyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
Yes, on the former, and its incredibly hard, even at the low level of Oxford collegiate reserve team football.
by papereyes » 18 Dec 2006 11:54
Anyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
by Y25 » 18 Dec 2006 11:59
by Mr Angry » 18 Dec 2006 13:34
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:34
Dirk Gently I've got no complaints with Poll, so yes, it is you.And why the hell didn't he book the Blackburn player for diving after Sonko fell over behind him in the penalty area ?!
because he didn't dive - he was brought down, but only 'cos Sonks fell and clipped him -0 no intent, no penalty, no dive.
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:35
AndyRFC He didnt have a bad game tbh. And it wasnt a dive.
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:38
AthleticoSpizzcare to back that up with fact?Muskrat No, Poll had a shocker today. He thinks he is the star and not the players and deliberatley courts controversy with some his decisions, which are purely attention seeking vehicles.
We lost to a better team on the day, but Mr Poll was hopeless. Some of his decisions were simply baffling, not to mention just plain wrong.
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:41
Alan Partridge Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:43
West Stand Man Muskrat, have you seen a replay of the Sonko incident with McCarthy. It was neither a dive nor was it a penalty. It was a good honest accident that involved one player falling forwards.
As to the other 'incidents' that you refer to, Poll was well up with play and a hell of a lot closer to them that you or me. I have a strong suspicion that he knows and understands the laws better than either of us. So, when it comes to deciding who was most probably right in his judgement who do you think I'll go with?
It is so easy to criticise the referee when you are not in extra-sensorial contact with him and have no idea what he has considered in making his call.
Oh and while I am at it, he disallowed the goal on the advice of his assistant. We advise people by giving them advice. See the subtle difference!
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:44
West Stand Man Anyone with more than half a brain who has seen the incident on TV will see that there was contact between Sonko's foot and McCarthy's that resulted in McCarthy's ankles clashing. McCarthy may well have accentuated the fall, but to call it a dive is laughable. It was accidental contact and that is that, no pen, no dive.
by brendywendy » 18 Dec 2006 13:46
by RoyalBlue » 18 Dec 2006 13:54
papereyesAnyone on here tried reffing a match? Or want to become a Ref for that matter?
Yes, on the former, and its incredibly hard, even at the low level of Oxford collegiate reserve team football.
by West Stand Man » 18 Dec 2006 17:45
brendywendyAlan Partridge Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
you are wrong too, check out the replays, worse dive of the season, by a mile and 3/4
i thought it was a pen from the north stand at the time though
by Platypuss » 18 Dec 2006 18:33
West Stand ManbrendywendyAlan Partridge Read 2 pages and seen little mention of Sonko's challenge. The most blatent penalty you will see all season not given in Blackburn's favour, or is it not allowed to see it slightly unbiased?
Poll got 2 things wrong for me, other than that was OK.
Blackburn had a sotnewall penalty when Sonko got rinsed and then dragged the guy down
And when Hunt I think was going through, there was a foul and should have been a free kick but was given their way!
you are wrong too, check out the replays, worse dive of the season, by a mile and 3/4
i thought it was a pen from the north stand at the time though
Ifyou seriously have seen the replays and still believe it was a true dive you are as thcik as your spelling indicates.
by royals pete » 18 Dec 2006 19:35
by West Stand Man » 18 Dec 2006 20:08
brendywendyWest Stand Man Anyone with more than half a brain who has seen the incident on TV will see that there was contact between Sonko's foot and McCarthy's that resulted in McCarthy's ankles clashing. McCarthy may well have accentuated the fall, but to call it a dive is laughable. It was accidental contact and that is that, no pen, no dive.
absolutely no contact whatsoever, he was 5 ft away
by West Stand Man » 18 Dec 2006 20:13
bcubed seems like you are on your own here WS Man
by Rhys The Royal » 18 Dec 2006 20:20
West Stand Manbcubed seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
by West Stand Man » 18 Dec 2006 20:23
YupRhys The RoyalWest Stand Manbcubed seems like you are on your own here WS Man
Apart from the others who agree with me, yes I am on my own!
Interestingly the Sky team all agreed with me yesterday; or I suppose to be more accurate, I agreed with them.
I'll stick to the facts for a moment (a rare commodity on here). There was clear contact between Sonko and McCarthy. McCarthy fell (somewhat dramatically). You can have your interpretation of guilt or otherwise, I'll have mine. Veterans of HNA will know that I have a superiority complex, based solely on my superiority. Hence my view is correct.
And youve seen the reverse angle?
Users browsing this forum: Royal Ginger and 294 guests