by winchester_royal » 30 Jul 2014 10:24
by Extended-Phenotype » 30 Jul 2014 10:38
winchester_royal You can yes, I'm well aware of that, but the fact is that if all they were doing was taking ownership of the debt then they'd effectively only be paying £5m for the club. If that was all SJM was looking for then he'd have sold it inside of 2 weeks.
By paying off the debt, and then an extra £5m, they are basically acquiring a debt free RFC for around the £30m mark. Which is about right.
by West Stand Man » 30 Jul 2014 10:50
Extended-Phenotypewinchester_royal You can yes, I'm well aware of that, but the fact is that if all they were doing was taking ownership of the debt then they'd effectively only be paying £5m for the club. If that was all SJM was looking for then he'd have sold it inside of 2 weeks.
By paying off the debt, and then an extra £5m, they are basically acquiring a debt free RFC for around the £30m mark. Which is about right.
No, they would need to pay the 25m to our debtors, thereby transferring our debt to them. If you owed me a fiver and your mate Dave said he'd take care of it, I'd expect Dave to pay me the bloody fiver. Then you'd owe him 5.
by winchester_royal » 30 Jul 2014 11:04
Extended-Phenotypewinchester_royal You can yes, I'm well aware of that, but the fact is that if all they were doing was taking ownership of the debt then they'd effectively only be paying £5m for the club. If that was all SJM was looking for then he'd have sold it inside of 2 weeks.
By paying off the debt, and then an extra £5m, they are basically acquiring a debt free RFC for around the £30m mark. Which is about right.
No, they would need to pay the 25m to our debtors, thereby transferring our debt to them. If you owed me a fiver and your mate Dave said he'd take care of it, I'd expect Dave to pay me the bloody fiver. Then you'd owe him 5.
by 10539.4 Miles Away » 30 Jul 2014 11:18
by winchester_royal » 30 Jul 2014 11:32
by Martin41 » 30 Jul 2014 12:48
marcusoppMartin41 Christ there are some idiots on here.......administration really?????
Oh well, suppose it gives the rest of us a laugh.......at them not with them!
None more stupid than you. I guess the 41 is your IQ right?
This club is losing money hand over fist. Madejski has lost 75% of his fortune and we're struggling to find actual investment.
All you need to do is look at what's happened to other 'stable' clubs in our position to realise we could be fecked in the not too distant future if we don't either sort out some investment or trim our expenses down, which means losing players and staff.
by Wycombe Royal » 30 Jul 2014 12:58
10539.4 Miles Away Isn't JM himself still our major creditor?
by 10539.4 Miles Away » 30 Jul 2014 13:06
Wycombe Royal10539.4 Miles Away Isn't JM himself still our major creditor?
I thought it was the Russians......
by marcusopp » 30 Jul 2014 13:31
Martin41marcusoppMartin41 Christ there are some idiots on here.......administration really?????
Oh well, suppose it gives the rest of us a laugh.......at them not with them!
None more stupid than you. I guess the 41 is your IQ right?
This club is losing money hand over fist. Madejski has lost 75% of his fortune and we're struggling to find actual investment.
All you need to do is look at what's happened to other 'stable' clubs in our position to realise we could be fecked in the not too distant future if we don't either sort out some investment or trim our expenses down, which means losing players and staff.
Just busted a rib, after reading your hilarious 41 that must be your i.q!!!
Other than some on here, no one has even spoke about administration. Yes we need new owners, what do you thinking they are trying to tie up at the moment.
If administration happens, which I very much doubt, then we can start to worry..........that's if not when!!
by UpThePrem » 30 Jul 2014 13:36
10539.4 Miles AwayWycombe Royal10539.4 Miles Away Isn't JM himself still our major creditor?
I thought it was the Russians......
You may well be right, was working from memory rather than any insider info
by Ian Royal » 30 Jul 2014 13:38
marcusoppMartin41 Christ there are some idiots on here.......administration really?????
Oh well, suppose it gives the rest of us a laugh.......at them not with them!
None more stupid than you. I guess the 41 is your IQ right?
This club is losing money hand over fist. Madejski has lost 75% of his fortune and we're struggling to find actual investment.
All you need to do is look at what's happened to other 'stable' clubs in our position to realise we could be fecked in the not too distant future if we don't either sort out some investment or trim our expenses down, which means losing players and staff.
by Agent Balti » 30 Jul 2014 13:39
UpThePrem Thought the vibrac loan paid off the Russians.
by RoyalBlue » 30 Jul 2014 13:46
multisync1830loyalroyal4life Robert Tan Net Worth $220m, mostly from real estate
Robert Tan built IGB Corp. from the small property developer he inherited to one of the country's largest landlords. Portfolio includes Malaysia's largest mall, in Mid-Valley City, and the Gardens mall. Shares wealth with sister Pauline Tan.
Perhaps they are interested in the land after all..
by maffff » 30 Jul 2014 13:47
Agent BaltiUpThePrem Thought the vibrac loan paid off the Russians.
No, the Vibrac loan was what the Russians leveraged against our parachute payments...I think.
by Ian Royal » 30 Jul 2014 13:48
Franchise FCIan Royalwinchester_royal I think it does. If they just leveraged the £25m against the club they're not actually paying off the debt, and only actually spending £5m and investing the rest. The deal was that they would be clearing the debts, and they can't do that in the way you're suggesting.
Hypothetically. They're paying off the debtors, which is essentially the same thing as paying the debt. The debt would then be a new debt to them, not the old debt. People don't usually just give £20m away. They normally expect a return.
Now maybe I've totally misunderstood. But it seems pretty naive to me to expect a Thai consortium to gift us £20m for the pleasure of spending £5m to own a loss making money sink.
They're paying off the creditors, not the debtors
by RoyalBlue » 30 Jul 2014 14:06
Lacoste Have to love watching a bunch of below average Joe's discussing the why's etc of a multi million £££££ takeover from their three bedroom semi detached, or more likely their parents house![]()
None of you have a clue so chill and wait to see who is involved/costed etc when all confirmed.
by Royal Biscuitman » 30 Jul 2014 14:15
by Extended-Phenotype » 30 Jul 2014 14:34
winchester_royalExtended-Phenotypewinchester_royal You can yes, I'm well aware of that, but the fact is that if all they were doing was taking ownership of the debt then they'd effectively only be paying £5m for the club. If that was all SJM was looking for then he'd have sold it inside of 2 weeks.
By paying off the debt, and then an extra £5m, they are basically acquiring a debt free RFC for around the £30m mark. Which is about right.
No, they would need to pay the 25m to our debtors, thereby transferring our debt to them. If you owed me a fiver and your mate Dave said he'd take care of it, I'd expect Dave to pay me the bloody fiver. Then you'd owe him 5.
*creditors. And there's a difference between rransfering debt and paying off debt. If Dave wanted to buy my phone for £10 and I was short on cash then I could say that if he pays off my debt to you then he can only owes me £5.
If the Thais are just transferring the debt so that its now owed to them then they have only spent £5m to acquire a football club that has assets of well over double that. Would be the deal of a lifetime.
by Uke » 30 Jul 2014 14:38
RoyalBlueLacoste Have to love watching a bunch of below average Joe's discussing the why's etc of a multi million £££££ takeover from their three bedroom semi detached, or more likely their parents house![]()
None of you have a clue so chill and wait to see who is involved/costed etc when all confirmed.
I think you seriously underestimate the business knowledge and acumen of some on this board. Just because people make work/life balance choices and decide not to sacrifice everything in their pursuit of endless riches doesn't mean that they aren't able to operate as extremely effective business people. I'm pretty sure there are some pretty high powered and successful individuals airing their views on HNA.
And a word of caution to others, just because Samuelson and Phoenix are perceived by most as the devil incarnate, doesn't mean that the Thais are saints with entirely honourable/philanthropic intent in relation to Reading FC.
Users browsing this forum: Y21 and 317 guests