by Silver Fox » 11 Mar 2009 09:29
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 11 Mar 2009 09:29
RoyaleeTony Le Mesmer For the 4th home game in a row we looked like a team that had gone into the game with no tactical preparation whatsoever.
Long was flattered by his 2 goals i think, spent most of the game satuesque whist Doyle worked his nuts off.
Our Centre Backs, particularly Duberry, were utter gash. Pearce is not even close to being good enough for a team looking for Premiership Football, i dont care if he came from our Academy or not. Bikey must feel insulted.
Please explain to me what Pearce did wrong all night.
by CMRoyal » 11 Mar 2009 09:31
by Schards#2 » 11 Mar 2009 09:33
CMRoyal Ah well, another small step towards a playoff place.Not sure about tactics, I think confidence is more the issue, especially at home where our support is abysmal with fans getting on the players' backs almost from the off. Earlier in the season, we would have destroyed Charlton, but now there's too much hesitancy all over the pitch. Even Long's great run for the penalty seemed to only make us more nervous about how to go about getting the winner. Both goals came from boldness, Long gambling that he could get in the box for the first and Cisse getting into an advanced position and making the ball his in the lead up to the corner. All too often in the first half it was lethargic, the defence panicky, no commitment from the midfield, and forwards not hitting the areas where it hurts when Little/Rosenior put crosses in. Marks:-
Fed - 5; has lost confidence, was poor on the second goal, and spilt a shot.
Rosey - 5; seems to be most affected by the crowd's whingeing attitude, constantly panicking and playing the rushed pass.
Doobs - 4; I said yesterday that recently he has had a tendency to leave his man, and it's costing us points. I'm a fan, but he needs to be dropped.
Pearce - 8; excellent, confident defensive performance and his distribution was better.
Stretch - 7; solid, unlucky on the freekick that led to their equaliser.
Blakey - 6; some pretty good crosses first half, but extremely leggy in the second.
Cisse - 6; stifled by the current midfield set-up, but occasionally able to show the damage he could do if given the chance.
Marek - 6; too good for tactics like ours. Always looking for the pass that hurts, hence occasionally overambitious, completely lost in the hoof-ball of the final third of the match.
S Hunt - 5; produced nothing, lacking in confidence. Tabb did enough to justify being given a start in his place.
Doyle - 6; seems leggy, should have played more central what with Glenda cutting in more than Kebe does. Needs a rest.
Long - 9; played the Doyle role to perfection. Just needs a touch more presence, but you can't fault a forward who scores two goals.
For the Ipswich game, I think we need Bikey in for Doobs - Pearce has the strength of character to take charge of that partnership. And Tabb for S Hunt, maybe even Kitson-Long up front, as Kev desperately needs a rest. N Hunt sadly is ineffective as an impact sub, so would have to make way. I'd stick to the Cisse/MM midfield for now, but we desperately need Kebe to come back to the bench (or Henry - when's he due to return?) because Blakey is only going to be good for a maximum of an hour a match for...well, at least the rest of this season, perhaps the remainder of his career.
Worrying times...unless you'd rather we didn't go up, of course.
by CMRoyal » 11 Mar 2009 09:33
by CMRoyal » 11 Mar 2009 09:34
Schards#2CMRoyal Ah well, another small step towards a playoff place.Not sure about tactics, I think confidence is more the issue, especially at home where our support is abysmal with fans getting on the players' backs almost from the off. Earlier in the season, we would have destroyed Charlton, but now there's too much hesitancy all over the pitch. Even Long's great run for the penalty seemed to only make us more nervous about how to go about getting the winner. Both goals came from boldness, Long gambling that he could get in the box for the first and Cisse getting into an advanced position and making the ball his in the lead up to the corner. All too often in the first half it was lethargic, the defence panicky, no commitment from the midfield, and forwards not hitting the areas where it hurts when Little/Rosenior put crosses in. Marks:-
Fed - 5; has lost confidence, was poor on the second goal, and spilt a shot.
Rosey - 5; seems to be most affected by the crowd's whingeing attitude, constantly panicking and playing the rushed pass.
Doobs - 4; I said yesterday that recently he has had a tendency to leave his man, and it's costing us points. I'm a fan, but he needs to be dropped.
Pearce - 8; excellent, confident defensive performance and his distribution was better.
Stretch - 7; solid, unlucky on the freekick that led to their equaliser.
Blakey - 6; some pretty good crosses first half, but extremely leggy in the second.
Cisse - 6; stifled by the current midfield set-up, but occasionally able to show the damage he could do if given the chance.
Marek - 6; too good for tactics like ours. Always looking for the pass that hurts, hence occasionally overambitious, completely lost in the hoof-ball of the final third of the match.
S Hunt - 5; produced nothing, lacking in confidence. Tabb did enough to justify being given a start in his place.
Doyle - 6; seems leggy, should have played more central what with Glenda cutting in more than Kebe does. Needs a rest.
Long - 9; played the Doyle role to perfection. Just needs a touch more presence, but you can't fault a forward who scores two goals.
For the Ipswich game, I think we need Bikey in for Doobs - Pearce has the strength of character to take charge of that partnership. And Tabb for S Hunt, maybe even Kitson-Long up front, as Kev desperately needs a rest. N Hunt sadly is ineffective as an impact sub, so would have to make way. I'd stick to the Cisse/MM midfield for now, but we desperately need Kebe to come back to the bench (or Henry - when's he due to return?) because Blakey is only going to be good for a maximum of an hour a match for...well, at least the rest of this season, perhaps the remainder of his career.
Worrying times...unless you'd rather we didn't go up, of course.
Can anyone spot a flaw in the argument highlighted?
by Stranded » 11 Mar 2009 09:34
Royalee The foul he gave away about 30 yards out? Yeah, the goal was his fault rather than Duberry's inability to mark a player inside the 6 yard box for the second game in a row. Probably the only foul he gave away all evening, where Duberry cost us more fouls than balls he actually won. I agree Pearce isn't the quickest, but he more than makes up for this in his reading of the game and aerial ability. Duberry is also slow but has neither of these qualities.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 11 Mar 2009 09:37
Stranded Only person to blame for the 2nd goal was Fed. No GK should let a ball that was basically floated in get to his byeline.
Royalee I agree Pearce isn't the quickest, but he more than makes up for this in his reading of the game and aerial ability.
by CMRoyal » 11 Mar 2009 09:37
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2009 09:54
by Royalee » 11 Mar 2009 10:04
The Surgeon of CrowthorneRoyaleeTony Le Mesmer For the 4th home game in a row we looked like a team that had gone into the game with no tactical preparation whatsoever.
Long was flattered by his 2 goals i think, spent most of the game satuesque whist Doyle worked his nuts off.
Our Centre Backs, particularly Duberry, were utter gash. Pearce is not even close to being good enough for a team looking for Premiership Football, i dont care if he came from our Academy or not. Bikey must feel insulted.
Please explain to me what Pearce did wrong all night.
Gave away the free kick that led to their equaliser.
by Alan Partridge » 11 Mar 2009 10:07
by Tilehurst End » 11 Mar 2009 10:09
by Alan Partridge » 11 Mar 2009 10:16
Tilehurst End Becoming a bit monotonous filing out of the ground listening to critisisim of referees, the state of the pitch and rather sad that the biggest cheer of the night is reserved for other teams' failings. The recent run has highlighted how much the influences of Murty and Ingimarrson are missed. Although Pearce, Duberry etc all defend well at times as individuals they are not playing as a cohesive unit, there's just no leader out there.
As for last night: Long looked bright and lively, Doyle burned out. Rosenior dreadful, Duberry slightly better but scares me when the ball's below head height, Pearce and Armstrong OK, Little unfit, Hunt had a couple of good moments and one decent cross early on, Matejovski was pass one lose one, Cisse had a good 15 minute spell in the 2nd half but with his attributes should produce more and Tabb did OK when he came on but not going to set the world alight.
by Royal Lady » 11 Mar 2009 10:21
it's a MINIMUM of 5 minutes added time, if he blew up on 5 minutes exactly, then he could have still allowed us to take the corner. HTH.Silver Fox No RL, he should have blown when time was up, which I'm guessing he did. If he got the timings right it was one fo the few correct decisions he made.
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 11 Mar 2009 10:24
by Silver Fox » 11 Mar 2009 10:30
Royal Ladyit's a MINIMUM of 5 minutes added time, if he blew up on 5 minutes exactly, then he could have still allowed us to take the corner. HTH.Silver Fox No RL, he should have blown when time was up, which I'm guessing he did. If he got the timings right it was one fo the few correct decisions he made.
by Royalee » 11 Mar 2009 10:32
Alan Partridge That's false Royalee.
by Royal Lady » 11 Mar 2009 10:33
Yeah. You're right. He WAS rubbish though. And I like a good moan.Silver FoxRoyal Ladyit's a MINIMUM of 5 minutes added time, if he blew up on 5 minutes exactly, then he could have still allowed us to take the corner. HTH.Silver Fox No RL, he should have blown when time was up, which I'm guessing he did. If he got the timings right it was one fo the few correct decisions he made.
He could have got it wrong wrt the actual time but if he felt that the additional time was up he was spot on in blowing up when he did. It's not really worth beefing about as to be honest it gave me a small LOLz as we left last night hearing people moanng that he should have let us take the corner for some reason, it could only have caused more ignorant consternation if he'd gone for the full CLive Thomas
by 79Royal » 11 Mar 2009 10:36
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Orion1871, WestYorksRoyal and 125 guests