To claim that Gunter had no end product today is ridiculous. He put in some great crosses with what is supposedly his weaker foot. With a fully fit Kermorgant and/or another decent striker we would have got a couple of goals from them. The likes of Quinn, Senior, Doyle or Long would have been feasting off them.windermereROYAL wrote:Well not much to be said about that borefest. huffed and puffed a lot. clearly instructed to get it in the box early.
The Yorkshire men clearly had just a point and defended very well and we didn't have the guile or know how to break them down.
when we finally created Barrow skied a very easy chance from 8 yards.
Mannone 6 rarely troubles ver calm with ball at his feet.
Gunter. 6 got forward a lot with no end product.
McShane. 7 rarely tested
Moore 7 has above.
Bacuna. 8 MOM for me. always trying to get forward and create.
JVDB 6 solid in the middle, and his hands full with Bannon.
Kelly 5 continues to disappoint.
Edwards. 5 ran around a lot, didn't do much.
Aluko 6 clearly a very skilful player, but need more from him.
Kermy 4 was he out there?
Barrow 5 point deducted for THAT miss.
subs.
Jon dadi 6 showed more then Kermy, but that wasn't hard.
Clement 6 would start him Tuesday,
Don’t people basically put up the ratings to debate them? It’s not being rude or moaning, it’s just discussing themPieEater wrote:you wonder why people don't post when the second third and fourth post are moaning about the first![]()
What does it matter how somebody rates a performance and a 5 a 6 or a 7, get a life FFS.
File these people who debate it under complete and utter twats
thanx, love you too.PieEater wrote:you wonder why people don't post when the second third and fourth post are moaning about the first![]()
What does it matter how somebody rates a performance and a 5 a 6 or a 7, get a life FFS.
File these people who debate it under complete and utter twats
Wouldn’t say I was a lurker exactlyPieEater wrote:Sorry Hound but it's lurkers like you that prefer to snipe and pick out scores rather than post an entire alternative perspective. If you have a view to debate then post it, don't pick on Wr for having the time and gumption to post a review that remote Royals might appreciate.
Look in the mirror when dishing out that insult. Surely the whole effing point of these forums is that it's a debate/discussion?! Follow your warped logic and there will only ever be one post as all agree with that poster.PieEater wrote:you wonder why people don't post when the second third and fourth post are moaning about the first![]()
What does it matter how somebody rates a performance and a 5 a 6 or a 7, get a life FFS.
File these people who debate it under complete and utter twats
You really don't understand what I said.RoyalBlue wrote:Look in the mirror you fool!PieEater wrote:you wonder why people don't post when the second third and fourth post are moaning about the first![]()
What does it matter how somebody rates a performance and a 5 a 6 or a 7, get a life FFS.
File these people who debate it under complete and utter twatsSurely the whole effing point of these forums is that it's a debate/discussion?! Follow your warped logic and there will only ever be one post as all agree with that poster.
Yep, agree with thatPieEater wrote:You really don't understand what I said.RoyalBlue wrote:Look in the mirror you fool!PieEater wrote:you wonder why people don't post when the second third and fourth post are moaning about the first![]()
What does it matter how somebody rates a performance and a 5 a 6 or a 7, get a life FFS.
File these people who debate it under complete and utter twatsSurely the whole effing point of these forums is that it's a debate/discussion?! Follow your warped logic and there will only ever be one post as all agree with that poster.
I'm not sure there is much point saying anything else.
There by ensuring a 2 page BFTG threadAthleticoSpizz wrote:Yes
try shuffling your original post words up a bit....it might’ve worked betterPieEater wrote:There by ensuring a 2 page BFTG threadAthleticoSpizz wrote:Yes
My point was, what is the point of shouting down peoples opinions, without posting your own. The only thing it does is stifle discussion and stop people posting opinions from fear of being shot down with people sniping about scores.AthleticoSpizz wrote:try shuffling your original post words up a bit....it might’ve worked betterPieEater wrote:There by ensuring a 2 page BFTG threadAthleticoSpizz wrote:Yes
The reason the BFTG is so dull is due to those of us who have been shot down for highlighting how shit this season has been right from the start and now those doing the shooting have gone fishing todayPieEater wrote:There by ensuring a 2 page BFTG threadAthleticoSpizz wrote:Yes
oh ok, I just thought that Joey was better value than the “6” that was awarded.....just my opinion,......other than that, I was happy...but I’ll quite happily join the twataratyPieEater wrote:My point was, what is the point of shouting down peoples opinions, without posting your own. The only thing it does is stifle discussion and stop people posting opinions from fear of being shot down with people sniping about scores.AthleticoSpizz wrote:try shuffling your original post words up a bit....it might’ve worked betterPieEater wrote:
There by ensuring a 2 page BFTG thread
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests