John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Yo Leon, I got the ko time wrong again
Congratulations on missing the game, envy you.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Yo Leon, I got the ko time wrong again
Ha ha you dodged several bullets.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Yo Leon, I got the ko time wrong again
they are unlistenable at times. the last 20 Mick started talking a bit of sense and wasn't going overboard. Dellor is abysmal.NewCorkSeth wrote:Sorry, one other talking point for me and it is regarding Tim and Micks favouritism. It was very obvious in the first half and so frustrating to listen to.
Whenever one of their preferred players does something wrong it is "thats not like them" or "shame that didn't come off" and they absolutely lambast the players they dont like for similar mistakes.
Case in point we have endlessly heard Mick have a go (often correctly) at Puscas for his hold up ability. He goes on and on about it. Talks about the requirements of a modern striker. However last night whenever the ball was played up to Baldock and he had a poor touch or was out-muscled the reaction was "oh well, thats a mismatch against the CB".
And their favourites get praise for the faintest of things. Baldock made a routine run off the shoulder of a defender last night, didnt get to the ball and they talked about how superb it was for a good minute!
I can guarantee that anyone who listens to their commentary is not getting a true sense of the game. They frequently brush over poor incidents from players they like and will talk endlessly about the shortcomings of the ones they dont.
Tim is worse though. Mick says his piece and will occasionally criticise his favourites when necessary but Tim acts like Micks little brother, for ever agreeing and often scornfully addressing certain playera Mick criticised the last game as if to win brownie points. I dont know why I listen.
I like them. I take your points yes there are irritations but people know what they're getting with these guys.NewCorkSeth wrote:Sorry, one other talking point for me and it is regarding Tim and Micks favouritism. It was very obvious in the first half and so frustrating to listen to.
Whenever one of their preferred players does something wrong it is "thats not like them" or "shame that didn't come off" and they absolutely lambast the players they dont like for similar mistakes.
Case in point we have endlessly heard Mick have a go (often correctly) at Puscas for his hold up ability. He goes on and on about it. Talks about the requirements of a modern striker. However last night whenever the ball was played up to Baldock and he had a poor touch or was out-muscled the reaction was "oh well, thats a mismatch against the CB".
And their favourites get praise for the faintest of things. Baldock made a routine run off the shoulder of a defender last night, didnt get to the ball and they talked about how superb it was for a good minute!
I can guarantee that anyone who listens to their commentary is not getting a true sense of the game. They frequently brush over poor incidents from players they like and will talk endlessly about the shortcomings of the ones they dont.
Tim is worse though. Mick says his piece and will occasionally criticise his favourites when necessary but Tim acts like Micks little brother, for ever agreeing and often scornfully addressing certain playera Mick criticised the last game as if to win brownie points. I dont know why I listen.
Worth 3 quid to pay for league 1 season ticket to soften the blow perhaps!Old Man Andrews wrote:We are currently 80/1 to get relegated. Got to be worth a fiver.
When Mick talks about tactical nous or the intricacy of defending man to man he is a fountain of wisdom. He does have real insight but Tim just doesn't get any of it out of him. I honestly think Ady would do a better job. Tim just pulls as much "grumpy old man" out of Mick as possible.Hound wrote:they are unlistenable at times. the last 20 Mick started talking a bit of sense and wasn't going overboard. Dellor is abysmal.NewCorkSeth wrote:Sorry, one other talking point for me and it is regarding Tim and Micks favouritism. It was very obvious in the first half and so frustrating to listen to.
Whenever one of their preferred players does something wrong it is "thats not like them" or "shame that didn't come off" and they absolutely lambast the players they dont like for similar mistakes.
Case in point we have endlessly heard Mick have a go (often correctly) at Puscas for his hold up ability. He goes on and on about it. Talks about the requirements of a modern striker. However last night whenever the ball was played up to Baldock and he had a poor touch or was out-muscled the reaction was "oh well, thats a mismatch against the CB".
And their favourites get praise for the faintest of things. Baldock made a routine run off the shoulder of a defender last night, didnt get to the ball and they talked about how superb it was for a good minute!
I can guarantee that anyone who listens to their commentary is not getting a true sense of the game. They frequently brush over poor incidents from players they like and will talk endlessly about the shortcomings of the ones they dont.
Tim is worse though. Mick says his piece and will occasionally criticise his favourites when necessary but Tim acts like Micks little brother, for ever agreeing and often scornfully addressing certain playera Mick criticised the last game as if to win brownie points. I dont know why I listen.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Kirtlington1940 and 67 guests