Survey Results

7 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
royal goof
Member
Posts: 119
Joined: 27 Jan 2005 12:49
Location: Over land and sea..

Survey Results

by royal goof » 10 May 2007 08:47

STAR, Survey results have been announced on the Official Website.

It mentions a number of positive responses which is great and which the club should be praised for.

However, it also mentions some negatives which scored pretty poorly compared to other clubs in the league. This refers to the price of food & drink (quality could also be an issue) and telephone contact.

Would STAR be able to get a response from the club on what they propose to do to rectify these negative areas please?

User avatar
STAR Liaison
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1408
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:58

Re: Survey Results

by STAR Liaison » 10 May 2007 12:12

royal goof STAR, Survey results have been announced on the Official Website.

It mentions a number of positive responses which is great and which the club should be praised for.

However, it also mentions some negatives which scored pretty poorly compared to other clubs in the league. This refers to the price of food & drink (quality could also be an issue) and telephone contact.

Would STAR be able to get a response from the club on what they propose to do to rectify these negative areas please?


It is certainly on our agenda for the next management meeting

User avatar
RG30
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6333
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 20:42

by RG30 » 10 May 2007 12:34

What made me laugh was how the club carried out an independant research at the Portsmouth game, yet by my reckoning 3 of the named had links with STAR, them being on the board. Any coincidence?

Behindu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1970
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 15:05

by Behindu » 10 May 2007 16:21

RG30 What made me laugh was how the club carried out an independant research at the Portsmouth game, yet by my reckoning 3 of the named had links with STAR, them being on the board. Any coincidence?


Laugh ?

I'd have thought getting fans to carry out a survey would be ideal.

66DD
Member
Posts: 193
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 01:08
Location: At the graveside of Cuchulain

by 66DD » 10 May 2007 19:23

The figures given for the average telephone response times would be more meaningful if they disclosed whether it was the mean, median or mode averages. Also what the range was and the upper and lower quartiles. Some correlation to time of day, number of staff on duty and where in the sales cycle of tickets each day was would help with an analysis.

That being said the average waiting times don't look too bad: but then again there are lies, damned lies and statistics.


User avatar
Skin
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1056
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 20:24
Location: You are now about to witness the strength of street knowledge

by Skin » 13 May 2007 23:39

66DD The figures given for the average telephone response times would be more meaningful if they disclosed whether it was the mean, median or mode averages. Also what the range was and the upper and lower quartiles. Some correlation to time of day, number of staff on duty and where in the sales cycle of tickets each day was would help with an analysis.

That being said the average waiting times don't look too bad: but then again there are lies, damned lies and statistics.


Just scrap the 0870 £££ £££ no.

User avatar
Magnus
Member
Posts: 829
Joined: 20 Dec 2004 22:17
Location: Tórshavn

by Magnus » 08 Jun 2007 14:21

Say no to 0870.

7 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

It is currently 02 May 2025 18:26