
by M4 Junction 11 » 19 Oct 2006 16:36
by floyd__streete » 20 Oct 2006 20:59
starliaison Is there a demand for another stewards forum?
by earley_royals » 20 Oct 2006 23:04
starliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced.
by STAR Liaison » 21 Oct 2006 09:34
floyd__streetestarliaison Is there a demand for another stewards forum?
No.
I went along to one of these some time back and they were oh so very different in their conduct and attitude on that ocassion than they are on matchdays when they are inconsistent, fussy and unhelpful. The attitude towards paying spectators is generally atrocious; last season I had some buffoon standing directly in my line of vision in a gangway trying unsuccessfully to apprehend someone for some heinous 'crime' or other until I suggested that he move on and get out of my way.
by The 17 Bus » 21 Oct 2006 09:46
by earley_royals » 21 Oct 2006 09:51
by The_Cat » 21 Oct 2006 10:46
What did they do?earley_royalsstarliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced.
Several people may be hoping they don't get a letter in the post in the next couple of weeks or so then.
by earley_royals » 21 Oct 2006 10:48
The_CatWhat did they do?earley_royalsstarliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced.
Several people may be hoping they don't get a letter in the post in the next couple of weeks or so then.
by M4 Junction 11 » 21 Oct 2006 10:50
earley_royals Why?
In the three or four years that I have sat in Y25 that is the first real time anything like that has happened. Y25 also creates the atmosphere in the ground due to it's banter with the away fans.
by The_Cat » 21 Oct 2006 11:02
I know but what are they getting banned for?earley_royalsThe_CatWhat did they do?earley_royalsstarliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced.
Several people may be hoping they don't get a letter in the post in the next couple of weeks or so then.
Read the thread.![]()
It's about what happened after the game on Saturday.
by DaveM » 21 Oct 2006 13:31
by Jerry St Clair » 22 Oct 2006 11:20
DaveM I think the problem is theres clearly 2 different viewpoints here, the Y25 view and the rest of the ground view.
by Royal Lady » 22 Oct 2006 11:38
Very true. And if I see anyone at the top of Y23 gesticulating to the away fans again, I shall ask for him to be removed.Jerry St ClairDaveM I think the problem is theres clearly 2 different viewpoints here, the Y25 view and the rest of the ground view.
Nope, we get grief in Y23 aswell.
IIRC a certain nobber was threatened with ejection once for throwing ticker tape in the air when the teams came out.
by amdocsroyal » 24 Oct 2006 23:56
Royal LadyVery true. And if I see anyone at the top of Y23 gesticulating to the away fans again, I shall ask for him to be removed.Jerry St ClairDaveM I think the problem is theres clearly 2 different viewpoints here, the Y25 view and the rest of the ground view.
Nope, we get grief in Y23 aswell.
IIRC a certain nobber was threatened with ejection once for throwing ticker tape in the air when the teams came out.
by The 17 Bus » 25 Oct 2006 06:41
by Sharpy » 25 Oct 2006 08:54
by reading98 » 25 Oct 2006 11:28
starliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced. Do not forget that these were used when we did not have a full stadium, so it is not a matter of just being able to resell the seat!
The message we received which may or may not go down well is that RFC want Reading fans to follow the example of the club this week and take the moral high ground. The want us all to show that we do not respond in kind to away followers who try to elict a response, and they certainly do not want supporters who are willing to start any fracas.
As far as the Chelsea supporters who got out of their area, although they should have been treated more harshly, the fact that it was after the game was ended meant that the stewards were attempting to calm them, as per the training that I have personally witnessed even if it is not always in evidence in the home stands, rather than have any further escalation.
by The_Cat » 25 Oct 2006 11:42
What did you actually do?reading98starliaisonCompo's Hat So what was discussed at the meeting?
That several Reading supporters will be receiving banning orders and will be shown the CCTV evidence that the order is based on and asked why they behaved like that. The orders will be appealable but will be for the rest of the season if enforced. Do not forget that these were used when we did not have a full stadium, so it is not a matter of just being able to resell the seat!
The message we received which may or may not go down well is that RFC want Reading fans to follow the example of the club this week and take the moral high ground. The want us all to show that we do not respond in kind to away followers who try to elict a response, and they certainly do not want supporters who are willing to start any fracas.
As far as the Chelsea supporters who got out of their area, although they should have been treated more harshly, the fact that it was after the game was ended meant that the stewards were attempting to calm them, as per the training that I have personally witnessed even if it is not always in evidence in the home stands, rather than have any further escalation.
I was one of these fans who got a banning order and took it with grace as I know I got wound up and should not of got involved in the trouble after the game but the way RFC dealt with it allowing me to get right up to the gate on sunday to be told in front of my parents and my girlfriend I would not be allowed into the game was a joke could of sent me a letter in the post. Now I have phoned the club everyday waiting to find out when my appeal date is I have already been told I won't be seeing a game at home again this season. All for be wound up by the poor stewarding not stopping chelsea fans on the pitch.
Silly boy
by Skin » 25 Oct 2006 12:00
by Platypuss » 25 Oct 2006 12:38
Sharpy its happens everywhere....happened in b18 when i used to sit there.
end of the day, the team are nothing without our support...our support needs to be vocal.
stewards and old bill are preventing this....sort it out!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests