lolwut?Davezk wrote:Reading Royals sounds stupid given the 2 names are pretty much synonymous
lolwut?Davezk wrote:Reading Royals sounds stupid given the 2 names are pretty much synonymous
syn·on·y·mous (s-nn-ms)Ouroboros wrote:lolwut?Davezk wrote:Reading Royals sounds stupid given the 2 names are pretty much synonymous
We are known as either Reading or The Royals - people immediately know who is being to referred to under either name.Sebastian wrote: Please explain how they are synonymous.

Double win....floyd__streete wrote:If AZ (who I still fear has a megalomaniacal streak) or any other faceless foreign owner fancies changing the name of our club then they'll no longer be able to rely on my season ticket money any more.No Fixed Abode wrote:Having just heard Hull City are being rebranded Hull City Tigers. Would you like Reading FC to become Reading Royals?
Big Foot wrote:Re: Hull City Tigers, nicked off Twitter but still LOLz![]()
"Tried to order some tickets for Hull City Tigers first game 'We've sold out' he said. I said 'I know but I'd still like some tickets please"
by Barry the bird boggler » 09 Aug 2013 18:24
09 Aug 2013 18:24I'm sure the Romans spelt it 'Redding' before it was changed later? I wouldn't be surprised if there was a rebranding here and it was already being phased in slowly - Royals. I don't think I'd care too much either as long as it wasn't something ridiculous like 'Hull City Tigers' or as it will be pushed on the continent - Hull Tigers. That's too American, too Rugby, and generally just shit!Barry the bird boggler wrote:Biggest problem I see is the spelling, too many people will see it as an advert for books, therefore I propose to "Slade" the club name to Redding (or "redin" to appeal to today's local youngsters a bit more)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests