how many?Mrs Butler probably coz it was done 6 times
did you say SIX?
by AthleticoSpizz » 02 Jan 2007 00:10
how many?Mrs Butler probably coz it was done 6 times
by willz_royal » 02 Jan 2007 11:30
AthleticoSpizzhow many?Mrs Butler probably coz it was done 6 times
did you say SIX?
by working class hero » 02 Jan 2007 12:46
by zac naloen » 02 Jan 2007 14:26
working class hero Lots of people enjoy it. IF that is so then we have no moral right to dictate to them.
Each to their own I suspect. Perhaps those who want change are more likely to be vocal than those who are content? FFS let this drop [BTW I don't join in].
by Stooper » 02 Jan 2007 15:21
by working class hero » 02 Jan 2007 23:34
zac naloenworking class hero Lots of people enjoy it. IF that is so then we have no moral right to dictate to them.
Each to their own I suspect. Perhaps those who want change are more likely to be vocal than those who are content? FFS let this drop [BTW I don't join in].
Oh I agree. But it doesn't need the music. If they don't blast the music out it also doesn't ruin the celebrations of those who don't enjoy it.. if you get my meaning.
by zac naloen » 03 Jan 2007 13:15
But I can go mental even if the music is played. And frankly anyone who says their enjoyment is ruined by a poxy sound clip is a mug.
by readingbedding » 03 Jan 2007 13:45
zac naloenBut I can go mental even if the music is played. And frankly anyone who says their enjoyment is ruined by a poxy sound clip is a mug.
Piss off, it comes on so loud that it can't help but jar my immediate celebration. I can ignore it after a couple of seconds by then the spontaneity is lost.
by zac naloen » 03 Jan 2007 13:49
readingbeddingzac naloenBut I can go mental even if the music is played. And frankly anyone who says their enjoyment is ruined by a poxy sound clip is a mug.
Piss off, it comes on so loud that it can't help but jar my immediate celebration. I can ignore it after a couple of seconds by then the spontaneity is lost.
hahaha.
Are you a goldfish?
Or just a complete fop.
Jar 1. to have a harshly unpleasant or perturbing effect on one's nerves, feelings, thoughts, etc.: The sound of the alarm jarred.
2. to produce a harsh, grating sound; sound discordantly.
3. to vibrate audibly; rattle: The window jarred in the frame.
4. to vibrate or shake.
5. to conflict, clash, or disagree.
by working class hero » 03 Jan 2007 18:54
Anti-Intellectualism is not cool.
by zac naloen » 03 Jan 2007 19:00
working class heroAnti-Intellectualism is not cool.
And writing 'piss off' is an intellectual response???????
by RfcMad2002 » 03 Jan 2007 22:50
by working class hero » 04 Jan 2007 00:12
zac naloenworking class heroAnti-Intellectualism is not cool.
And writing 'piss off' is an intellectual response???????
Certainly not, except it's not the ONLY thing I wrote and considering that you felt the need to insult me it was entirely justifiable response.
by zac naloen » 04 Jan 2007 00:34
working class herozac naloenworking class heroAnti-Intellectualism is not cool.
And writing 'piss off' is an intellectual response???????
Certainly not, except it's not the ONLY thing I wrote and considering that you felt the need to insult me it was entirely justifiable response.
No insult. I merely used an apposite noun.
But I can go mental even if the music is played. And frankly anyone who says their enjoyment is ruined by a poxy sound clip is a mug.
by working class hero » 05 Jan 2007 21:49
by working class hero » 05 Jan 2007 21:55
Assuming that is what you are referring too..
by zac naloen » 05 Jan 2007 22:23
apposite
adjective FORMAL
suitable and right for the occasion:
an apposite phrase/quotation/remark
The film starts in a graveyard, an apposite image for the decaying society which is the theme of the film.
(from Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)
BTW the sentence construction is also erroneous. In the context 'to' is a preposition and consequently you should have written something along the lines of :
'Assuming it is that to which you refer'....
by Rawlie19 » 06 Jan 2007 11:53
by working class hero » 06 Jan 2007 14:42
Rawlie19 Are you two still arguing? Get a life and move on. This thread is about Tom Hark, not correct use of English grammar.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests