by retro royal » 07 Mar 2016 13:32
by Sutekh » 07 Mar 2016 13:44
by CountryRoyal » 07 Mar 2016 14:24
Sutekh Why's that then? Do you get a season off if you get relegated?
by JamieY26 » 07 Mar 2016 14:36
by Stranded » 07 Mar 2016 14:42
by Nameless » 07 Mar 2016 15:07
by bobby1413 » 07 Mar 2016 15:08
CountryRoyal On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
by tidus_mi2 » 07 Mar 2016 15:20
by John Smith » 07 Mar 2016 15:22
by Nameless » 07 Mar 2016 16:13
John Smith Are people genuinely talking about rugby on here?
by paultheroyal » 07 Mar 2016 16:27
Nameless and it wouldn't make that much difference to the pitch so we'd need another excuse for that....
by Maneki Neko » 07 Mar 2016 16:40
by Wimb » 07 Mar 2016 16:57
“Firstly, we won’t get relegated. But even if we did, we will still be at Madejski Stadium.
“You would expect when these sort of contracts are put in place long term all different eventualities are factored in.
“One of those is what league we are playing in, but there is no grey area. It is very clear, the contract works for us and we enjoy being at Madejski Stadium.
“We will be staying there regardless of what league we are playing in next year. That is covered in the contract so we are absolutely relaxed about that. It won’t happen.”
by West Stand Man » 07 Mar 2016 18:12
JamieY26 It wouldn't surprise me if they have opted to not strengthen in order to go down and release themselves from the contract they have with the stadium and move to Brentford new ground when its finished.
There won't be a huge difference in the money the club receives as there is no real money in the game anyway.
They used to sell out the stoop when they played there, so I would imagine they would be willing to take a hit for a year in order to achieve their long term ambition of playing in London.
by leon » 07 Mar 2016 18:13
NamelessJohn Smith Are people genuinely talking about rugby on here?
sure, some people can appreciate a wide range of sports. I understand for some a simple game like football is as much as they can handle but there are more sophisticated options
by West Stand Man » 07 Mar 2016 18:15
bobby1413CountryRoyal On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
True dat... it's an utter disgrace
by Ian Royal » 07 Mar 2016 18:23
West Stand Manbobby1413CountryRoyal On a side note the pitch is truly shocking, I don't remember it this bad for some time.
True dat... it's an utter disgrace
But not a lot to do with the Irish playing on it. The problems go deeper than that.
by Nameless » 07 Mar 2016 18:36
by leon » 07 Mar 2016 20:51
by paultheroyal » 07 Mar 2016 20:58
Nameless The pitch is designed to cope with the use it gets. And the areas of worst wear are pretty obviously caused by football use.
It's fair to say if the pitch was used less, and especially if there were fewer double header weekends it might help keep it better but I don't think there is much evidence that the rugby causes the pitch problems.
Irish shared The Stoop before moving into the Madejski.
As for rugby players being repressed homosexuals it's a thought that rugby is one of the few sports where openly gay players and officials have been involved at the very top level with barely an eyebrow raised. Repressed or just not bothered about it ? Whereas football is way too scared of it to do anything other than use it as a term of abuse. Very sophisticated......
Users browsing this forum: madStadDad and 71 guests