by TBM » 12 Jun 2015 16:15
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jun 2015 16:16
by linkenholtroyal » 12 Jun 2015 16:17
by Pepe the Horseman » 12 Jun 2015 16:17
by linkenholtroyal » 12 Jun 2015 16:19
by TBM » 12 Jun 2015 16:24
Pepe the Horseman Takes one to know one.
by Baggie192 » 13 Jun 2015 19:27
by LoyalRoyal22 » 27 Jun 2015 14:51
by Baggie192 » 27 Jun 2015 15:22
LoyalRoyal22 Mixed reports, some saying he is out of contract , others aren't. Strange
by Nameless » 27 Jun 2015 16:37
by sandman » 27 Jun 2015 16:52
by Hoop Blah » 27 Jun 2015 17:58
sandman Perhaps the idea of placeholder who waits for Foster to get fit before dropping back to the bench for the season doesn't appeal to Mr Myhill as much as it did 17 days ago.
by sandman » 27 Jun 2015 18:18
Hoop Blahsandman Perhaps the idea of placeholder who waits for Foster to get fit before dropping back to the bench for the season doesn't appeal to Mr Myhill as much as it did 17 days ago.
I don't think Myhill had any say in the extension so what he thinks now or 17 days ago shouldn't really have any bearing on things.
It could be that West Brom have taken up the option just to get a fee for a player who wants to leave and has interest and a potential move lined up.
Clarke did hint that one of the keepers he had lined up may cost a little bit, perhaps that's a fee for Myhill to get him out of this additional year? I doubt it, but it's plausible, especially as Myhill said he didn't know what was happening about his contract not too long ago.
by Baggie192 » 27 Jun 2015 18:27
Hoop Blahsandman Perhaps the idea of placeholder who waits for Foster to get fit before dropping back to the bench for the season doesn't appeal to Mr Myhill as much as it did 17 days ago.
I don't think Myhill had any say in the extension so what he thinks now or 17 days ago shouldn't really have any bearing on things.
It could be that West Brom have taken up the option just to get a fee for a player who wants to leave and has interest and a potential move lined up.
Clarke did hint that one of the keepers he had lined up may cost a little bit, perhaps that's a fee for Myhill to get him out of this additional year? I doubt it, but it's plausible, especially as Myhill said he didn't know what was happening about his contract not too long ago.
by Woodley-RFC » 27 Jun 2015 20:13
Myhill worked under Clarke at West Brom and Clarke would like to reunite with the keeper. Although Boaz will probably be the first choice now, Ben foster will be back from injury soon, resulting in Myhill resorting back to the bench. At the age of 32, that isn't something you want to be doing, so a move to Reading would be a good one for him and ReadingBaggie192Hoop Blahsandman Perhaps the idea of placeholder who waits for Foster to get fit before dropping back to the bench for the season doesn't appeal to Mr Myhill as much as it did 17 days ago.
I don't think Myhill had any say in the extension so what he thinks now or 17 days ago shouldn't really have any bearing on things.
It could be that West Brom have taken up the option just to get a fee for a player who wants to leave and has interest and a potential move lined up.
Clarke did hint that one of the keepers he had lined up may cost a little bit, perhaps that's a fee for Myhill to get him out of this additional year? I doubt it, but it's plausible, especially as Myhill said he didn't know what was happening about his contract not too long ago.
Very UnlikelyDue to the fact we pay decent wages I can't see him giving up Premiership footy plus a pay cut. When his likely to have at least 6 months as a No.1 He's had chances to go before, but, has always stayed, so, he must like the club
by TheBaldOne » 28 Jun 2015 00:28
Baggie192Hoop Blahsandman Perhaps the idea of placeholder who waits for Foster to get fit before dropping back to the bench for the season doesn't appeal to Mr Myhill as much as it did 17 days ago.
I don't think Myhill had any say in the extension so what he thinks now or 17 days ago shouldn't really have any bearing on things.
It could be that West Brom have taken up the option just to get a fee for a player who wants to leave and has interest and a potential move lined up.
Clarke did hint that one of the keepers he had lined up may cost a little bit, perhaps that's a fee for Myhill to get him out of this additional year? I doubt it, but it's plausible, especially as Myhill said he didn't know what was happening about his contract not too long ago.
Very UnlikelyDue to the fact we pay decent wages I can't see him giving up Premiership footy plus a pay cut. When his likely to have at least 6 months as a No.1 He's had chances to go before, but, has always stayed, so, he must like the club
by Sutekh » 28 Jun 2015 08:37
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jun 2015 11:24
sandman![]()
No shit, really?
Baggie192 Very UnlikelyDue to the fact we pay decent wages I can't see him giving up Premiership footy plus a pay cut. When his likely to have at least 6 months as a No.1 He's had chances to go before, but, has always stayed, so, he must like the club
by Baggie192 » 28 Jun 2015 14:37
Hoop Blahsandman![]()
No shit, really?
Not sure what you're point is here sandman, you were the one that said he might not be so keen on staying as he was 17 days before when the contract was extended.Baggie192 Very UnlikelyDue to the fact we pay decent wages I can't see him giving up Premiership footy plus a pay cut. When his likely to have at least 6 months as a No.1 He's had chances to go before, but, has always stayed, so, he must like the club
You may well be right, I've no idea how much he'll be on or what we're looking to offer him or how much he's got a taste for playing every week again after the last few months. I imagine he's earned enough from being so well paid at West Brom to be able to take a bit of a drop in pay to play every week if he wants to.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 50 guests