by Harpers So Solid Crew » 30 Oct 2011 18:35
by Arch » 31 Oct 2011 00:44
Harpers So Solid Crew I want an ambitious manager, i want a manager that other teams wish they had, in all I want McD to be in demand, i then want RFC to show him the backing a manager in demand deserves, so he is allowed to build a team in his wish list, to achieve a promotion and more. sadly something McGee and Pards did not feel was forthcoming from JM.
by Always_Royal » 31 Oct 2011 08:41
ArchHarpers So Solid Crew I want an ambitious manager, i want a manager that other teams wish they had, in all I want McD to be in demand, i then want RFC to show him the backing a manager in demand deserves, so he is allowed to build a team in his wish list, to achieve a promotion and more. sadly something McGee and Pards did not feel was forthcoming from JM.
Agreed. McGhee and Pardew could clearly see we would never get to the Premier League under JM's stewardship, and I imagine Brian will smart enough to see it the same way.
by Royal Rother » 31 Oct 2011 08:45
by melonhead » 31 Oct 2011 10:06
ArchHarpers So Solid Crew I want an ambitious manager, i want a manager that other teams wish they had, in all I want McD to be in demand, i then want RFC to show him the backing a manager in demand deserves, so he is allowed to build a team in his wish list, to achieve a promotion and more. sadly something McGee and Pards did not feel was forthcoming from JM.
Agreed. McGhee and Pardew could clearly see we would never get to the Premier League under JM's stewardship, and I imagine Brian will smart enough to see it the same way.
by Royal Lady » 31 Oct 2011 17:34
by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2011 18:42
by leicsRoyal » 01 Nov 2011 07:51
by melonhead » 01 Nov 2011 10:02
Royal Lady Maybe, the poster meant McGhee and Pardew could see we wouldn't get to the Premiership under JM's stewardship DURING THEIR REIGN. If they thought we would have, they would, surely, have stayed?
by Hoop Blah » 01 Nov 2011 13:15
by melonhead » 01 Nov 2011 15:09
Hoop Blah I should think that both Pardew and McGhee thought they had better chances of suceeding and bettering themselves with the clubs they left for.
Getting promoted at Reading would've been harder to achieve and no doubt less lucrative for them than going to Leicester or West Ham.
I'd agree with Ian that McDermott probably sees us less as a stepping stone than the other two. Would that ultimately stop him leaving us if someone like West Ham came knocking on his door? I doubt it.
which isnt the same thing as thinking it more likely elsewhere.McGhee and Pardew could see we wouldn't get to the Premiership under JM's stewardship DURING THEIR REIGN
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 04 Nov 2011 21:13
melonheadRoyal Lady Maybe, the poster meant McGhee and Pardew could see we wouldn't get to the Premiership under JM's stewardship DURING THEIR REIGN. If they thought we would have, they would, surely, have stayed?
mghee had a bit to spend didnt he?
pards spent every year
if anything that probably had more to spend than coppell did(as a percentage of income). so im not sure why they thought that
by melonhead » 05 Nov 2011 15:50
by Big Foot » 06 Nov 2011 08:37
Ian Royal Well considering we'd finished 4th the season before with Pardew and were flying high before he left and we were challenging at the top under McGhee and went on to finish second, that would be a particularly cretinous opinion to have.
Especially seeing as under JM's stewardship we've got promoted once, made two play off finals and been in two further play off competitions.
If you mean Arch he was obviously being sarcastic.
by SCIAG » 06 Nov 2011 11:44
Big FootIan Royal Well considering we'd finished 4th the season before with Pardew and were flying high before he left and we were challenging at the top under McGhee and went on to finish second, that would be a particularly cretinous opinion to have.
Especially seeing as under JM's stewardship we've got promoted once, made two play off finals and been in two further play off competitions.
If you mean Arch he was obviously being sarcastic.
1 of those play off finals was for promotion into Div1 not the Premiership
by Ian Royal » 06 Nov 2011 16:34
Big FootIan Royal Well considering we'd finished 4th the season before with Pardew and were flying high before he left and we were challenging at the top under McGhee and went on to finish second, that would be a particularly cretinous opinion to have.
Especially seeing as under JM's stewardship we've got promoted once, made two play off finals and been in two further play off competitions.
If you mean Arch he was obviously being sarcastic.
1 of those play off finals was for promotion into Div1 not the Premiership
by SpaceCruiser » 07 Nov 2011 14:48
SCIAGBig FootIan Royal Well considering we'd finished 4th the season before with Pardew and were flying high before he left and we were challenging at the top under McGhee and went on to finish second, that would be a particularly cretinous opinion to have.
Especially seeing as under JM's stewardship we've got promoted once, made two play off finals and been in two further play off competitions.
If you mean Arch he was obviously being sarcastic.
1 of those play off finals was for promotion into Div1 not the Premiership
Erm, no. The finals against Bolton and Swansea were both to the Premiership (founded 1993).
by Ian Royal » 07 Nov 2011 17:12
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 07 Nov 2011 17:29
Ian Royal How is the Walsall Final in Cardiff relevant to a discussion about our prospects of promotion to the Premier League under Madejski's stewardship Spacemoron? We aren't talking about at any level.
by Ian Royal » 07 Nov 2011 19:17
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests