by LoyalRoyalFan » 11 Mar 2012 21:15
by Cobi » 12 Mar 2012 07:38
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Mar 2012 08:42
Badger Finger I would welcome him to the club with open arms...
by Geekins » 12 Mar 2012 10:14
by Shaka's Giant Hands » 12 Mar 2012 10:22
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2012 11:04
Ian Royal I'd take Mullins on loan to give us more depth in midfield. Howard's not in the frame and I think he'd add more than Tabb. Gunnarsson isn't really up to standard to be anything other than dire emergency cover in midfield IMO. Useful to have with quite a few games coming in quick succession.
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Mar 2012 11:16
Shaka's Giant Hands Jonny Fordham has just tweeted this rumour.
Really starting to believe that it may happen now.
by Ian Royal » 12 Mar 2012 11:38
melonheadIan Royal I'd take Mullins on loan to give us more depth in midfield. Howard's not in the frame and I think he'd add more than Tabb. Gunnarsson isn't really up to standard to be anything other than dire emergency cover in midfield IMO. Useful to have with quite a few games coming in quick succession.
dont ever say that about gunnarson again.
by Gordons Cumming » 12 Mar 2012 11:43
Franchise FC Our style is to play with two defensive midfielders. What happens if one gets injured ?
Changing the style is clearly not McD's first choice
by Big Foot » 12 Mar 2012 12:06
Wash your mouth out with soapIan RoyalmelonheadIan Royal I'd take Mullins on loan to give us more depth in midfield. Howard's not in the frame and I think he'd add more than Tabb. Gunnarsson isn't really up to standard to be anything other than dire emergency cover in midfield IMO. Useful to have with quite a few games coming in quick succession.
dont ever say that about gunnarson again.
His best place is now full back, and we're now extremely well covered there. The last two seasons by far his best performances have been in defence. Love him to bits, but reality is reality.
by melonhead » 12 Mar 2012 12:09
Ian RoyalmelonheadIan Royal I'd take Mullins on loan to give us more depth in midfield. Howard's not in the frame and I think he'd add more than Tabb. Gunnarsson isn't really up to standard to be anything other than dire emergency cover in midfield IMO. Useful to have with quite a few games coming in quick succession.
dont ever say that about gunnarson again.
His best place is now full back, and we're now extremely well covered there. The last two seasons by far his best performances have been in defence. Love him to bits, but reality is reality.
by loyalroyal4life » 12 Mar 2012 12:13
by Croydon Royal » 12 Mar 2012 12:42
melonheadIan Royal
His best place is now full back, and we're now extremely well covered there. The last two seasons by far his best performances have been in defence. Love him to bits, but reality is reality.
your statements are based on no evidence
and you are wrong. gunnarson is a god, and can play anywhere he likes for us for the next ten years.
by Geekins » 12 Mar 2012 12:55
by Cobi » 12 Mar 2012 13:41
loyalroyal4life until the end of the season YES, for next season NO
by Friday's Legacy » 12 Mar 2012 20:04
by Cobi » 13 Mar 2012 06:41
Friday's Legacy
by melonhead » 13 Mar 2012 09:41
Croydon RoyalmelonheadIan Royal
His best place is now full back, and we're now extremely well covered there. The last two seasons by far his best performances have been in defence. Love him to bits, but reality is reality.
your statements are based on no evidence
and you are wrong. gunnarson is a god, and can play anywhere he likes for us for the next ten years.
Why the hell should he be made to retire in ten years? His next contract should be for 20 years minimum I say.
by Hoop Blah » 13 Mar 2012 11:56
CobiFriday's Legacy
Why did he reply to your tweet in private? That could suggest he has less confidence in the deal going through.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests