by Jackson Corner » 13 Dec 2006 12:08
by Tony Le Mesmer » 13 Dec 2006 12:26
Citizen Nice guy.
Dodgy keeper.
Distribution awful.
Postioning suspect.
You can do anything with statistics.
Just look and watch.
Nice guy.
by zac naloen » 13 Dec 2006 12:36
Game poised at 0-0, Marcus makes a great save & quickly makes a great throw/kick to set up a counter attack & we go 1-0 up. How many times did this happen last season? obviously down to dodgy keeping and awful distribution. oh and i suppose it was suspect positioning that meant he failed to stop a 25 yard rocket from Emre that dipped at the last minute, having gone into the game with only a penalty conceeded in 4 matches?
Think you need to 'look and watch' a bit more Citizen
by jm_cooper » 13 Dec 2006 12:49
by Tony Le Mesmer » 13 Dec 2006 13:00
zac naloenGame poised at 0-0, Marcus makes a great save & quickly makes a great throw/kick to set up a counter attack & we go 1-0 up. How many times did this happen last season? obviously down to dodgy keeping and awful distribution. oh and i suppose it was suspect positioning that meant he failed to stop a 25 yard rocket from Emre that dipped at the last minute, having gone into the game with only a penalty conceeded in 4 matches?
Think you need to 'look and watch' a bit more Citizen
I suggest you learn a little something about context. People are discussing this season. Not last season, the reason people are criticising his distribution is because we want what he was doing last season back.
by Man Friday » 13 Dec 2006 13:20
by comeonthebiscuitmen » 13 Dec 2006 13:21
by zac naloen » 13 Dec 2006 13:23
Tony Le Mesmerzac naloenGame poised at 0-0, Marcus makes a great save & quickly makes a great throw/kick to set up a counter attack & we go 1-0 up. How many times did this happen last season? obviously down to dodgy keeping and awful distribution. oh and i suppose it was suspect positioning that meant he failed to stop a 25 yard rocket from Emre that dipped at the last minute, having gone into the game with only a penalty conceeded in 4 matches?
Think you need to 'look and watch' a bit more Citizen
I suggest you learn a little something about context. People are discussing this season. Not last season, the reason people are criticising his distribution is because we want what he was doing last season back.
People failing to put things into context is one of the points im trying to make.
For a period of 10 games (most of which was playing whilst injured by all accounts) his distribution was not good. The opposition is also far better, which has made the quick throw out to the full backs a lot harder this season. That on the back of about 200 appearances where his distribution was superb.
He's not the best in the prem, far from it, but you do not compete with some of the best teams in the World with a shit keeper FFS.
by If you still hate Futcher » 13 Dec 2006 13:55
jm_cooper i just got the train from Reading to London and big Marcus was on it!
was pretty rammed so both of us were standing in the aisle.
he had his missus with him. my summary: fit, but not "premiership footballer" fit.
by Stranded » 13 Dec 2006 13:57
by Cookie » 13 Dec 2006 22:15
Man Friday What's the point of saying he's a "top five" 'keeper when he's third in the ratings. You may as well say he's "top ten" or "top twenty". Better still, can we say he's currently "top three"?
by E. Andrew » 14 Dec 2006 08:56
jm_cooper i just got the train from Reading to London and big Marcus was on it!
was pretty rammed so both of us were standing in the aisle.
he had his missus with him. my summary: fit, but not "premiership footballer" fit.
by Wax Jacket » 14 Dec 2006 08:57
jm_cooper he had his missus with him. my summary: fit, but not "premiership footballer" fit.
by Cookie » 14 Dec 2006 21:53
jm_cooper i just got the train from Reading to London and big Marcus was on it!
was pretty rammed so both of us were standing in the aisle.
he had his missus with him. my summary: fit, but not "premiership footballer" fit.
by blade 1 » 14 Dec 2006 22:14
by Finchley Royal » 14 Dec 2006 23:41
by Royalee » 15 Dec 2006 02:27
by Factfinder » 15 Dec 2006 19:05
Royalee These ratings fail to take into account shots on goal and saves a keeper actually makes. All it means is the defence is playing well, not necessarily the keeper. It's a load of bollocks.
by Abbo » 26 Dec 2006 13:46
Users browsing this forum: Snowflake Royal and 278 guests