by holsgrove breaks a leg » 24 Jan 2007 18:32
by Uke » 24 Jan 2007 18:59
by Stranded » 24 Jan 2007 19:30
by Millsy » 24 Jan 2007 19:37
Stranded I can exclusively confirm that Sonko will be out until he's back.
by The Rouge » 24 Jan 2007 19:46
by RoyalBlue » 24 Jan 2007 19:48
RoyalupnorthWycombe Royal I think there might be further damage that hasn't been made public yet, hence why they are being a bit vague in their statements.
I considered that, but then thought why?
They now know conclusively what is wrong, there is no need to be vague.
If there was other damage, then he will take longer to rehab, then we will all think that Fearn is shite because he takes so long to get players back.
Its best for all concerned to be honest about it.
But, I think they are being vague because its difficult to say for sure how long it will take on the same day as the operation.
I think we will find out more in a week or so.
by Stranded » 24 Jan 2007 19:58
RoyalBlueRoyalupnorthWycombe Royal I think there might be further damage that hasn't been made public yet, hence why they are being a bit vague in their statements.
I considered that, but then thought why?
They now know conclusively what is wrong, there is no need to be vague.
If there was other damage, then he will take longer to rehab, then we will all think that Fearn is shite because he takes so long to get players back.
Its best for all concerned to be honest about it.
But, I think they are being vague because its difficult to say for sure how long it will take on the same day as the operation.
I think we will find out more in a week or so.
When have the club ever told us the full truth about injuries? (there was no way in a million years that Brynjar or Murty were going to be back as quickly as the club initially suggested). They are always given a positive spin to try to keep fans positive and reduce the inevitable cries for the Chairman to spend some money on strengthening the squad!
Still good news is that if we don't need to spend any money strengthening our squad by the end of the season we should be able to get a bit of a refund on our season tickets as they won't have used all that extra money they told us they needed!
by Z-Head » 25 Jan 2007 10:46
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 25 Jan 2007 11:16
StrandedRoyalBlueRoyalupnorthWycombe Royal I think there might be further damage that hasn't been made public yet, hence why they are being a bit vague in their statements.
I considered that, but then thought why?
They now know conclusively what is wrong, there is no need to be vague.
If there was other damage, then he will take longer to rehab, then we will all think that Fearn is shite because he takes so long to get players back.
Its best for all concerned to be honest about it.
But, I think they are being vague because its difficult to say for sure how long it will take on the same day as the operation.
I think we will find out more in a week or so.
When have the club ever told us the full truth about injuries? (there was no way in a million years that Brynjar or Murty were going to be back as quickly as the club initially suggested). They are always given a positive spin to try to keep fans positive and reduce the inevitable cries for the Chairman to spend some money on strengthening the squad!
Still good news is that if we don't need to spend any money strengthening our squad by the end of the season we should be able to get a bit of a refund on our season tickets as they won't have used all that extra money they told us they needed!
At no time has the club said that the extra income from ticket would be used to purchase players.
Users browsing this forum: East Grinstead Royal, Google Adsense [Bot], Larry_Parnell and 238 guests