by KC Royal »
02 Mar 2007 12:31
2 world wars, 1 world cup :shock:
I didn't get tpo watch this match (working). I'm shocked about the seemingly unanimous view on poor Seol.
Was he REALLY that bad????
Although there were concerns as to his fitness levels as he would slow down afetr 70 mins or so he used to be awesome.
And that overwhelmingly pro-Reading report (Coppellism) heaps praise on Seol for being a reason we destroyed Man Utd in our turnaround.
So how come there are so many negative views? Is it the typical bandwagon jumping (and scapegoating) that occurs on HNA or is it truly that the guy was terrible?
I'm confused.

You're not the only one, granted watching on TV is different from being there but he certainly wasnt anonymous and although lacked much spark put in some dangerous crosses and had a shot in the 1st half which but for a good save from Van De Saar was going in. I do think Oster and Little would be a better option down the wings though, certainly Oster is more deserving of a starting place after his cup performances.
Edit - assuming Hunt doesnt play of course!
For me I was more concerned with Ingimarrson. I didnt want to give him a 5 but he got off to a poor start and was pretty anonymous for the rest of the match. In the 2nd half it seemed as though Gunarrsson and Bikey were covering for him a lot.