by RG30 » 31 Mar 2007 12:49
by John Madejski's Wallet » 31 Mar 2007 12:58
Archie's penalty The only problem is the Lita/Doyle partnership doesn't really work.
by Jimbo » 31 Mar 2007 13:02
John Madejski's WalletArchie's penalty The only problem is the Lita/Doyle partnership doesn't really work.
Worked well enough last season
by Archie's penalty » 31 Mar 2007 13:54
JimboJohn Madejski's WalletArchie's penalty The only problem is the Lita/Doyle partnership doesn't really work.
Worked well enough last season
Worked well enough for this season too.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 31 Mar 2007 14:31
Archie's penaltyJimboJohn Madejski's WalletArchie's penalty The only problem is the Lita/Doyle partnership doesn't really work.
Worked well enough last season
Worked well enough for this season too.
I'm not sure if it did really. At that point in the season Doyle was scoring all the goals and Lita wasn't getting any (until Chelsea away). Coppell even brought Seol in for a while up front as Doyle and Lita weren't clicking. When they (Doyle/Lita) play up front together they make runs which don't co-ordinate. That's why I would have to agree with earlier writers that the best partnership is anyone with Kitson. I think Doyle has the edge in this respect normally but Lita is playing so well at the moment you can't drop him. It is nice to have such a wealth of striking options though and what with Long playing well for the Republic it's all looking pretty rosy!
by doylefan » 31 Mar 2007 20:17
by runrunrunrungilksey » 31 Mar 2007 21:42
1871 RoyalArchie's penalty1871 Royal Kitson & Doyle - My #1 partnership.
Think Lita is in too good form to drop him. Kitson on the other hand ain't. The only problem is the Lita/Doyle partnership doesn't really work. It's a canundrum. In line with Coppell's policy I'm pretty sure that it'll be Kitson and Lita with Doyle ready to put the cat amongst the pidgeons with a super-sub performance...
You could be right there. I think Doyle & Kitson work better. Doyle is always looking for Kitsons little flicks, whereas Lita might not be.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1058 guests