by Lieutenant Pigeon » 29 May 2007 09:40
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 29 May 2007 12:32
by RoyalBlue » 29 May 2007 12:51
StrandedRoyalBlueBehinduJackson Corner It seems the team that wins this game is more important than the one's who do it by going up in the promotion places? The 60 million pound game....... I don't recall us being labeled the 60 million pound league winners?
Rightly so. When we won the league the projected income was a lot lower as the new TV deal hadn;t been signed.
Had to alugh at the number of times people said that winning the playoff final was 'the best' way to get promoted.
I'm pretty sure that getting promoted with 106 points and wiping th efloor with the rest of the league was way, way better than scraping up via a lottery !
We are rarely as one on things RFC but that's exactly the same remark I made to my family as we watched the game and the commentator came out with that remark!
There can be no better way of doing it than 'The Reading Way'!
Whilst I agree, for the sheer adrenaline rush that goes with gaining promotion over one cup final then the play-offs cannot be beat. Doing it our way is better for the prolonged high that goes with it but the winner takes all nature of a one off game heightens that emotion.
by Berthwaite » 29 May 2007 12:52
by Henleyensian » 29 May 2007 13:09
by biscuitsrus » 29 May 2007 13:52
TailsKatie Marsden They are a bigger club.
They've got a bigger ground, will have a bigger average attendance and will spend more on players this summer than we will. They've also won a fair amount, unlike ourselves.
I very much doubt they'll finish anywhere near us though.
seconded - size is not directly proportionate to success
by Y25 » 29 May 2007 14:12
by Tails » 29 May 2007 14:17
biscuitsrusTailsKatie Marsden They are a bigger club.
They've got a bigger ground, will have a bigger average attendance and will spend more on players this summer than we will. They've also won a fair amount, unlike ourselves.
I very much doubt they'll finish anywhere near us though.
seconded - size is not directly proportionate to success
by Franchise FC » 29 May 2007 19:49
kingthor I don't think Derby has any chance of staying up, and I honestly don't think Birmingham or Sunderland have much of a chance either. Of course, it is early to make predictions.
by RoyalBlue » 29 May 2007 20:17
Franchise FCkingthor I don't think Derby has any chance of staying up, and I honestly don't think Birmingham or Sunderland have much of a chance either. Of course, it is early to make predictions.
Please..PLease..PLEase..PLEAse..PLEASe..PLEASE don't become what we hated last year. The likelihood of all three going down is extremely small.
Sunderland (without the first six games) were not that far short of the sort of form that we showed last year.
by Ian Royal » 29 May 2007 22:02
RoyalBlueFranchise FCkingthor I don't think Derby has any chance of staying up, and I honestly don't think Birmingham or Sunderland have much of a chance either. Of course, it is early to make predictions.
Please..PLease..PLEase..PLEAse..PLEASe..PLEASE don't become what we hated last year. The likelihood of all three going down is extremely small.
Sunderland (without the first six games) were not that far short of the sort of form that we showed last year.
But that (the first six games) is exactly why they are so far short of what we were.
RTGs maybe, but none of the promoted teams played football anywhere near as well as we did last year.
by brendywendy » 30 May 2007 09:35
by pardew'spony » 30 May 2007 10:16
by Fred Sharpe's Nose » 30 May 2007 10:36
Ian Royal I think we'll do better than enough teams, but I don't think it'll be as easy for us as last season.
by SpaceCruiser » 30 May 2007 11:10
Franchise FCkingthor I don't think Derby has any chance of staying up, and I honestly don't think Birmingham or Sunderland have much of a chance either. Of course, it is early to make predictions.
Please..PLease..PLEase..PLEAse..PLEASe..PLEASE don't become what we hated last year. The likelihood of all three going down is extremely small.
Sunderland (without the first six games) were not that far short of the sort of form that we showed last year.
Birmingham have some financial clout and connections through Bruce.
Derby - who knows.
Remember, everyone thought we'd be straight back down.
by Dirk Gently » 30 May 2007 11:12
by Vision » 30 May 2007 11:16
Dirk Gently The scary thing about Sunderland is the wealth of their co-owners - all three of them are in the Top 30 in the ST Rich list, so if they wanted to they could throw some extremely serious money at the team.
by Dirk Gently » 30 May 2007 11:41
by papereyes » 30 May 2007 11:51
Users browsing this forum: Polonia and 302 guests