Rhys The Royal What's wrong with Internet Explorer? Easier surely?
Firefox is the Bang & Olufsen of web browsers
by bb0118 » 05 Jul 2007 16:54
Rhys The Royal What's wrong with Internet Explorer? Easier surely?
by PieEater » 06 Jul 2007 12:30
Rhys The Royal What's wrong with Internet Explorer? Easier surely?
by phil in cornwall » 10 Jul 2007 09:26
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Jul 2007 09:29
phil in cornwall http://www.readingfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsIndex/0,,10306,00.html
OS currently advertising information about Wycombe Wanderers with links that don't work.
Is this an improvement?
by Y21 » 10 Jul 2007 22:07
by Winchester Royal » 10 Jul 2007 22:51
Y21 Anyone notice the shit quality of the photos from the Korean tour so far? More like somebodys snaps with a disposable camera that they just found - surely the mighty Premiership Reading FC can afford a decent photographer to go on tour with them who knows which end of the lens is which.
by Platypuss » 10 Jul 2007 23:45
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Jul 2007 08:32
by Winchester Royal » 11 Jul 2007 11:07
Wycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
by Arch » 13 Jul 2007 01:22
by bassavage » 13 Jul 2007 14:05
by Barry the bird boggler » 13 Jul 2007 14:10
Winchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
by RoyalBlue » 13 Jul 2007 14:16
Barry the bird bogglerWinchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
All the quality photos that get posted to the OS generate no comments yet as soon as one slightly dodgy picture appears the photographer gets slated.
Must be HNA.
by phil in cornwall » 15 Jul 2007 18:54
by bb0118 » 15 Jul 2007 20:20
phil in cornwall I just tried to watch the River Plate highlights on Reading World but the quality was so poor it wasn't worth watching. I used to be able to watch highlights last season - although they were rather jerky at least they were worth viewing.
Is any one else having problems?
I tried pausing and waiting for a bit, as they suggest, but it wasn't much better.
by 2.8 lita injection » 15 Jul 2007 21:17
bassavage It is very slow IMO though, a lot slower than the old website.
by Winchester Royal » 19 Jul 2007 15:39
Barry the bird bogglerWinchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
All the quality photos that get posted to the OS generate no comments yet as soon as one slightly dodgy picture appears the photographer gets slated.
Must be HNA.
by TFF » 19 Jul 2007 16:08
Winchester RoyalBarry the bird bogglerWinchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
All the quality photos that get posted to the OS generate no comments yet as soon as one slightly dodgy picture appears the photographer gets slated.
Must be HNA.
A photographer's job is to provide quality photos.
If he doesn't do that, he should get slated.
If you turn in crap quality work in your job, do people not complain?
by Winchester Royal » 19 Jul 2007 16:41
That Friday FeelingWinchester RoyalBarry the bird bogglerWinchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
All the quality photos that get posted to the OS generate no comments yet as soon as one slightly dodgy picture appears the photographer gets slated.
Must be HNA.
A photographer's job is to provide quality photos.
If he doesn't do that, he should get slated.
If you turn in crap quality work in your job, do people not complain?
If I turn in shit work my boss doesn't use it.
OS: We need a picture of SC in the media throng
Photographer: I've only got a shit one.
OS: Send it in anyway, we decide if it's good enough to publish.
Photographer: OK
But you can blame the photographer if you like.
by shadesrwrf » 21 Jul 2007 10:19
Winchester RoyalThat Friday FeelingWinchester RoyalBarry the bird bogglerWinchester RoyalWycombe Royal I would hazard a guess that the photographer is having to struggle to get through the hoards of Korean photographers/journalists just to be able to get a sight of the Reading players and officials.
I would hazard a guess that he either doesn't know how to use his camera, or doesn't have the professional self respect not to publish poor quality photographs.
All the quality photos that get posted to the OS generate no comments yet as soon as one slightly dodgy picture appears the photographer gets slated.
Must be HNA.
A photographer's job is to provide quality photos.
If he doesn't do that, he should get slated.
If you turn in crap quality work in your job, do people not complain?
If I turn in shit work my boss doesn't use it.
OS: We need a picture of SC in the media throng
Photographer: I've only got a shit one.
OS: Send it in anyway, we decide if it's good enough to publish.
Photographer: OK
But you can blame the photographer if you like.
I will, because any Tom Dick or Harry could have taken that picture.
Not a photographer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests