by Darren Caskey's Dietician » 16 Dec 2007 21:36
by Ian Royal » 16 Dec 2007 22:12
by Jackson Corner » 17 Dec 2007 00:47
by Arch » 17 Dec 2007 00:50
It doesn't matter how much Sunderland offer him. It's RFC they need to persuade. In my view, Hunt would be a perfect candidate fro the Sidwell approach. We simply couldn't gain enough by selling him. As somebody pointed out recently, 2.5 mil doesn't buy you much.Jackson Corner Money talks Sunderland could offer him 40k a week as they are Kieren Richardson and Chopra. But why he would want to join a club playing in the championship next season is beyond me.
by Dawn » 17 Dec 2007 12:05
by Tinrib » 17 Dec 2007 12:13
Dawn Sunderland being linked with Hunt and Doyle!
http://www.sunderlandecho.com/safc/Sunderland-linked-with-Reading-duo.3596801.jp
Sounds like Sunderland are trying to unsettle our players before the game on Saturday
by Gus the teenage cow » 17 Dec 2007 12:24
by Fat Leather Jacket » 17 Dec 2007 12:58
by Gus the teenage cow » 17 Dec 2007 13:01
Fat Leather Jacket Why do people assume that paddies just want to congregate round each other? Irish connection indeed.
by Alan Partridge » 17 Dec 2007 13:01
Fat Leather Jacket Why do people assume that paddies just want to congregate round each other? Irish connection indeed.
by Fat Leather Jacket » 17 Dec 2007 13:06
Gus the teenage cowFat Leather Jacket Why do people assume that paddies just want to congregate round each other? Irish connection indeed.
what nationality are you? let me see if i can find a patronising label that acially sterotypes you
what a pcunt
by andrew1957 » 17 Dec 2007 13:52
by Ian Royal » 17 Dec 2007 13:56
andrew1957 If we accepted less than £5M for Hunt and he was not offered £40K plus a week there is no chance of this happening.
Why would we sell one of our most effective players and why on earth would he want to go to a side in considerable risk of relegation - certainly much greater risk than of Reading ging down.
by andrew1957 » 17 Dec 2007 14:00
Ian Royalandrew1957 If we accepted less than £5M for Hunt and he was not offered £40K plus a week there is no chance of this happening.
Why would we sell one of our most effective players and why on earth would he want to go to a side in considerable risk of relegation - certainly much greater risk than of Reading ging down.
because we're using the money to fund a replacement who's better, is the only possible answer.
by Ian Royal » 17 Dec 2007 14:02
andrew1957Ian Royalandrew1957 If we accepted less than £5M for Hunt and he was not offered £40K plus a week there is no chance of this happening.
Why would we sell one of our most effective players and why on earth would he want to go to a side in considerable risk of relegation - certainly much greater risk than of Reading ging down.
because we're using the money to fund a replacement who's better, is the only possible answer.
Our current track record of finding "better" players is hardly great. Much rather keep our effective players like Hunt and Shorey unless they really want to go.
The whole year inn Why?
Irish connection with Roy Keane.
Will up his wages by a fair whack.
Not totally unthinkable
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 17 Dec 2007 14:59
by Only one Trevor Morley » 17 Dec 2007 15:37
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 72 guests