by Millsy » 02 Jun 2008 12:12
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Jun 2008 12:19
by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2008 12:42
by papereyes » 02 Jun 2008 12:47
SpaceCruiserBarry the bird boggler Looks like next season could well be a bit dodgy if the season following our last two relegations is repeated....
That probably depends on the players who leave and come in. When we were relegated in 1988 and 1998, the teams were very different from those that came up. Our team this season is largely the same as the one that won the Championship at a canter, but with the possibility of Shorey and one or two others, this could be different.
by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2008 12:49
papereyesSpaceCruiserBarry the bird boggler Looks like next season could well be a bit dodgy if the season following our last two relegations is repeated....
That probably depends on the players who leave and come in. When we were relegated in 1988 and 1998, the teams were very different from those that came up. Our team this season is largely the same as the one that won the Championship at a canter, but with the possibility of Shorey and one or two others, this could be different.
Sticking with players that have the experience but *somehow* aged two years in the process and then you're shocked that the team isn't quite as successful?
by papereyes » 02 Jun 2008 12:52
Ian RoyalpapereyesSpaceCruiser That probably depends on the players who leave and come in. When we were relegated in 1988 and 1998, the teams were very different from those that came up. Our team this season is largely the same as the one that won the Championship at a canter, but with the possibility of Shorey and one or two others, this could be different.
Sticking with players that have the experience but *somehow* aged two years in the process and then you're shocked that the team isn't quite as successful?
Being older doesn't mean worse. Plenty of our players have improved significantly since that season. Which will hopefully counter balance the ones who's ageing has weakened them.
by strap » 02 Jun 2008 13:06
by Forbury Lion » 02 Jun 2008 13:12
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Jun 2008 13:13
by bcubed » 02 Jun 2008 13:39
strap Thought I'd lost it ... here you go Spacey ...
Coouple of 3rd power polynomial trendlines added for interest. Not sure how much they tell really, but look good!
by SpaceCruiser » 02 Jun 2008 13:53
papereyesIan Royal Being older doesn't mean worse. Plenty of our players have improved significantly since that season. Which will hopefully counter balance the ones who's ageing has weakened them.
There's a significant group of players that simply aren't gonna get much better.
Remove, replace, improve.
by Huntley & Palmer » 02 Jun 2008 17:18
by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2008 18:37
papereyesIan Royalpapereyes Sticking with players that have the experience but *somehow* aged two years in the process and then you're shocked that the team isn't quite as successful?
Being older doesn't mean worse. Plenty of our players have improved significantly since that season. Which will hopefully counter balance the ones who's ageing has weakened them.
There's a significant group of players that simply aren't gonna get much better.
Remove, replace, improve.
by Royal With Cheese » 02 Jun 2008 20:19
Huntley & Palmer I can't believe I actually bothered looking at this thread, let alone got to page 2
by Southbank Old Boy » 02 Jun 2008 20:44
Ian Royal I think Hunt, Harper, Kitson, Lita, Doyle and Long will all have grown as players, even after some of them have had horrible seasons. Then we have the likes of Bikey and Matejovski who undoubtedly improve the side. We have gaps and areas that need strengtherning. But remember Coppell has a talent for spotting players able to storm tier 2.
by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2008 22:20
Southbank Old BoyIan Royal I think Hunt, Harper, Kitson, Lita, Doyle and Long will all have grown as players, even after some of them have had horrible seasons. Then we have the likes of Bikey and Matejovski who undoubtedly improve the side. We have gaps and areas that need strengtherning. But remember Coppell has a talent for spotting players able to storm tier 2.
The problem your overlooking is that a few of those 'better' players probably won't be here. If they are they're probably going to be less fired up to succeed than last time round. I think they proved last year how they thought they'd already made it and took their eye off the ball.
Realistically I can't see that attitude being reversed by them dropping down a division.
by The Brain » 02 Jun 2008 23:38
by RichieBowman » 04 Jun 2008 21:27
by SpaceCruiser » 04 Jun 2008 21:47
Users browsing this forum: Sutekh and 305 guests