SteveRoyalJohn 3:16 Just seen that we are going to appeal... But will he be able to play tomorrow?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 763324.stm
Looks like, if it is rescinded then he will be able to play.
But are we going to appeal?
by John 3:16 » 08 Dec 2008 18:52
SteveRoyalJohn 3:16 Just seen that we are going to appeal... But will he be able to play tomorrow?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 763324.stm
Looks like, if it is rescinded then he will be able to play.
by woodley_royal_124 » 08 Dec 2008 19:06
by woodley_royal_124 » 08 Dec 2008 19:09
bring back Graham Poll/
by Sun Tzu » 08 Dec 2008 19:15
Hoop BlahtowserSL2crew6ft Kerplunk From where I was sat it looked like the ref clearly indicated that an elbow had been used when the Reading players were hassling him. For what its worth I think it did us the world of good. Certainly upped the intensity of the performance and the ref may well have thought he'd made a mistake as he seemed to give us every marginal decision in the second half. After the Hume incident I'm not surprised that a ref didn't want to not send a player off aghainst Barnsley if he thought an elbow had been used. However its not like the Barnsley player was poleaxed, don't think he even moved let alone fell over.
The ref definately did gesture that an elbow had been used as he walked back towards the halfway line. This was wrong , but we have appealed anyway so hope we win.These refs this season are really shite, bring back Graham Poll/
If thats the case and thats what he's put in his report then that might explain why we have appealed as the video is pretty clear that there was no elbow used.
by RoyalBlue » 08 Dec 2008 19:18
Sun Tzuwinchester_royal He raised his arms, therefore the red card will be justified in the FA's eyes.
The best he can hope for is a reduction.
There is no option for a 'reduction'.
Either it was violent conduct and a 3 match ban or it wasn't in which there is no ban.
I don't think there is any real chance it will be extended to 4 games though, it would have to be a ridiculous appeal for that. Raising your arms is not an automatic red card offence, if it were there would be loads of red cards every week. We've seen in recent games at the Mad Stad that players approach each other with raised arms regularly and nothing is done.
by Hoop Blah » 08 Dec 2008 19:38
Sun Tzu The 'raising your hands' thing is just another TV pundit cliche - like 'ball to hand'. And we all know how clued up on the laws the TV pundits are....
by brendywendy » 08 Dec 2008 20:24
by Percy's Rocket » 08 Dec 2008 20:26
by bishbosh92 » 08 Dec 2008 20:38
by S09Royal » 08 Dec 2008 20:42
by Sun Tzu » 08 Dec 2008 20:43
by Sun Tzu » 08 Dec 2008 20:46
brendywendy if he raised his hands he has no chance of rescinding it
surprised at coppell to be fair
by bishbosh92 » 08 Dec 2008 20:50
Well whatever it is there deffinatly something, as a agree we wouldnt treat it differently for a laugh.Sun Tzu Perhaps there is additional footage of the Kebe incident ?
Perhaps the referee's report describes the kebe incident differently to the footage available ?
Perhaps the referee has suggested to the club that there may be grounds for appeal which he would not contest ?
Perhaps after two contentious red cards the club want to use the appeal to make a point of some kind ?
Whatever the case I doubt that the club have simply decided to treat this totally differently the the Bikey incident for a laugh...
by RFCBoy » 08 Dec 2008 20:53
by Percy's Rocket » 08 Dec 2008 21:09
by Royalwaster » 08 Dec 2008 21:13
by rfcjoe » 08 Dec 2008 21:16
by bishbosh92 » 08 Dec 2008 21:20
by rfcjoe » 08 Dec 2008 21:22
by S09Royal » 08 Dec 2008 21:23
bishbosh92 Oh not good
must of had a shocker or got injured!!
Users browsing this forum: Dirk Gently, Royals and Racers, South Coast Royal, Tinpot Royal and 211 guests