by Big Foot » 29 Dec 2008 13:28
by Dirk Gently » 29 Dec 2008 13:29
by Big Foot » 29 Dec 2008 13:33
by Thames » 29 Dec 2008 13:55
by Sarah Star » 29 Dec 2008 15:02
by RoyalBlue » 04 Jan 2009 12:04
bobby1413Dirk Gently I think the wording is that they need "reasonable suspicion" that there will be "alcohol related trouble."
That is a horribly-drawn law, completely open to interpretation. Interestingly, the Home Office guidance on this is more specific and includes safeguards - it's this document that is being utterly ignored by certain Police Forces!
You are correct, it is badly written legislation with no real definition it seems. Even the Crown Prosecution Service don't recognise it.
by davis69 » 14 Jan 2009 23:11
by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2009 07:41
by T.R.O.L.I. » 15 Jan 2009 07:42
by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2009 11:52
by Big Foot » 02 Feb 2009 17:38
by 66DD » 03 Feb 2009 11:38
Big Foot Met using them on sober civilians on Saturday. Shameful.
by STAR Voice » 03 Feb 2009 11:41
Big Foot Section 27's being dished out like Xmas cards by Hampshire police yesterday
Big Foot Met using them on sober civilians on Saturday. Shameful.
66DD Where abouts were the Met issuing Section 27 notices and where were the notices instructing people to vacate from and to where?
by .:BigDaveInTheDungeon:. » 12 Mar 2009 19:36
by Row Z Royal » 12 Mar 2009 21:11
.:BigDaveInTheDungeon:. lock up the lot of them, bloody yobo's
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests