In theory, but that doesn't take into account different styles of play which may be more adaptable to players at different levels of fitness. Or rather be less dependent on a high level of fitness.Dirk Gently wrote:Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
But then, if we have the resources to play fitter players - players who didn't turn out in the earlier game - and the opposition don't, then we have an advantage.Dirk Gently wrote:Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
Yes, but that advantage is only theoretical beacuse there's a very real danger of either those players not being as good as the ones who are being rested or that the changes to the team disrupts the team and their style of play.rabidbee wrote:But then, if we have the resources to play fitter players - players who didn't turn out in the earlier game - and the opposition don't, then we have an advantage.Dirk Gently wrote:Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
Surely that's the art of management thoughDirk Gently wrote:Yes, but that advantage is only theoretical beacuse there's a very real danger of either those players not being as good as the ones who are being rested or that the changes to the team disrupts the team and their style of play.rabidbee wrote:But then, if we have the resources to play fitter players - players who didn't turn out in the earlier game - and the opposition don't, then we have an advantage.Dirk Gently wrote:Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
As has been pointed out on here, and by Coppell this season, the central midfield players in our system have to cover a hell of a lot of ground and so their level of fatigue is greater than the rest of the team.brendywendy wrote:Since ivar and doobs kept their places it looks like rest wasnt the only consideration
I thought you said they were sat behind you? Inconsistency to your story makes it doubtful for me to believe TFFThat Friday Feeling wrote:I let this go on (non stop) for about twenty minutes before I turned around and suggested they put up or shut up and that I didn't appreciate their behaviour in front of my kids.
....but self-abuse is probably the thing that they do best.winchester_royal wrote:It's a good point you made to the ignorant tits TFF. If some of our so called fans put their energies into supporting the team rather than whingeing and (in some moronic cases) singing self-abusive songs, then the whole atmosphere would be a hell of a lot better.
Are you by any chance bald? Myself and a mate were sat a few rows behind you and did feel quite sorry for you by the end. Was amazed that we were able to stand for the first 35 minutes and actually attempt to make some noise depsite no one joining in around us but meh, few games aside that's how it's always going to be!WoodleyRoyal wrote:i spent the whole bloody game on my feet (despite complaints from behind me) i was about half way down to the right ,trying to get the atmosphere going almoast single handedley, i kept turning round and trying to get people on there feet but was being looked at as is i had shit on my face, top left were good but the support was dire the bloke behind me even said i'd give up its like a morge i just dont understand why our support is so awfull it was christmas a local game and judging by yates in town centre and a pub closer to the ground a fair few of us whwere there early and drinking.
I assume this is "processing" in the digital sense of the word, rather than in the old sense of either sending them off to the chemists or messing about in a dark room?rabidbee wrote:I finally got around to processing my photos from the match:
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 65 guests