Ian Royal I'd be happy if he stopped making such large stat filled posts and didn't reply to the same thing with two or three posts in a row.
Right
by Rex » 25 Feb 2009 23:52
Ian Royal I'd be happy if he stopped making such large stat filled posts and didn't reply to the same thing with two or three posts in a row.
by poohs pure » 26 Feb 2009 17:58
Snowballpoohs pure
please don't encourage mr statto please, he will eventually become a hate figure on here.
Feel free. What you think of me matters not.
by Snowball » 26 Feb 2009 18:19
by poohs pure » 26 Feb 2009 18:21
Snowball I'm totally chilled.
by Ian Royal » 26 Feb 2009 18:47
royalexileIan Royal I'd be happy if he stopped making such large stat filled posts and didn't reply to the same thing with two or three posts in a row.
Right
by loyalroyal4life » 26 Feb 2009 19:13
by Ian Royal » 26 Feb 2009 19:32
loyalroyal4life Bikey should be in for Doobs END OF
by Platypuss » 26 Feb 2009 19:54
loyalroyal4life END OF
by poohs pure » 26 Feb 2009 20:34
by brendywendy » 27 Feb 2009 09:14
Ian Royalloyalroyal4life Bikey should be in for Doobs END OF
Even though Doobs has been playing pretty well recently? Thought he's looked the best of our defenders recently.
by bishbosh92 » 27 Feb 2009 11:50
are you mad Doobs has been brillaint if any1 is goin to be dropped for Bikey its Pearce hands down as he is to inexperienced.brendywendyIan Royalloyalroyal4life Bikey should be in for Doobs END OF
Even though Doobs has been playing pretty well recently? Thought he's looked the best of our defenders recently.
spot on
by londinium » 27 Feb 2009 12:12
by brendywendy » 27 Feb 2009 12:54
bishbosh92are you mad Doobs has been brillaint if any1 is goin to be dropped for Bikey its Pearce hands down as he is to inexperienced.brendywendyIan Royal Even though Doobs has been playing pretty well recently? Thought he's looked the best of our defenders recently.
spot on
but i would like to no why Bikey isnt playing as he appears to be fit can any1 awnser this.
by AlexY25 » 27 Feb 2009 14:47
Snowball I was asked to look up the stats for Reading games with/without Bikey
I'm doing requests now
by Snowball » 27 Feb 2009 15:49
AlexY25 Don't suppose you could look up stats of results where Lita and Marek have started together?
by CMRoyal » 27 Feb 2009 15:55
Snowball Matejovsky starts
W 1-0 Boro (No Lita)
W 2-0 MAN CITY (No Lita)
W 2-1 BIRMINGHAM (No Lita)
W 4-0 Derby Lita scored in 90th minute
by Ian Royal » 27 Feb 2009 21:58
by Snowball » 27 Feb 2009 22:23
Ian Royal I've got a request snowball.
oxf*rd off.
by Platypuss » 27 Feb 2009 23:56
Snowball So (forget Lita for a minute) look at Matejovsky starts
Matejovsky has started 7 Premiership and 1 Championship game
W4 D2 L2 (Fulham (H) & Liverpool (A) = 1.75 points a game!!!
by Platypuss » 28 Feb 2009 00:21
SnowballAlexY25 Don't suppose you could look up stats of results where Lita and Marek have started together?
Last year, Matty's first game was the 1-0 win at Boro after 8 losses (No Lita)
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Four Of Clubs, Jinx, MartinRdg, Mr Angry, Orion1871, rabidbee and 304 guests