by OLLIE KEARNS » 09 Mar 2009 12:45
by brendywendy » 09 Mar 2009 12:49
Having to start Hunt at left back and become one of the few sides to lose to Charlton was the up shot of this totally misplaced loyalty that should have cost Coppell his job.
by Woodcote Royal » 09 Mar 2009 12:57
brendywendyHaving to start Hunt at left back and become one of the few sides to lose to Charlton was the up shot of this totally misplaced loyalty that should have cost Coppell his job.
or just due to not being able to bring in armstrong as quickly as we had wished?
by RobRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 13:29
Woodcote Royal
Having to start Hunt at left back and become one of the few sides to lose to Charlton was the up shot of this totally misplaced loyalty that should have cost Coppell his job.
by Snowball » 09 Mar 2009 13:55
Maguire I don't think Shane touched the ball that led to Kebe's goal either, but it really doesn't matter. Challenging for it took out that defender and let Kebe in so it's all good.
Tilehurst End Most pleasing thing was that Kebe was actually anticipating a flick on which is not always the case with our strikers/midfielders.
by Platypuss » 09 Mar 2009 14:01
by CMRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 14:06
Earlier in the thread, SnowballCMRoyal
Yes (the club and radio are wrong), not that it matters that much. In fact, I'm kind of glad he gets a stat that reflects his overall contribution to the game.
I don't know you, CM, or know what view you had, or know your eyesight
and I just cannot remember the moments leading up to Kebe's shot and goal
But I can't think of any obvious reason why I should believe you over the radio professionals and the official club view.
Not saying you are wrong. Just applying common sense
Then Snowball Just watched it 14 times on ITV4, agree he didn't touch it,
by Hoop Blah » 09 Mar 2009 14:11
by CMRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 14:16
Hoop Blah I'd argue that Long's challenge is an assist and again it highlights how limited stats can be. In most stats packages that wouldn't be classed as an assist (if recorded correctly) but without that key contribution the goal wouldn't have happened.
All these assist stats are so limited because they're usually just taken as the last attacking player to touch the ball before a goal is scored. Any one who knows anything about football is aware that that isn't always the key moment in the build up to a goal.
by Hoop Blah » 09 Mar 2009 14:26
CMRoyalHoop Blah I'd argue that Long's challenge is an assist and again it highlights how limited stats can be. In most stats packages that wouldn't be classed as an assist (if recorded correctly) but without that key contribution the goal wouldn't have happened.
All these assist stats are so limited because they're usually just taken as the last attacking player to touch the ball before a goal is scored. Any one who knows anything about football is aware that that isn't always the key moment in the build up to a goal.
Agreed, and reflecting on this 'accidental' credit (which simultaneously negates MM's part in the goal), I'm not sure we can trust official stats on assists at all. They usually give us only a partial picture, and as demonstrated here can also be incorrect anyway.
by CMRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 14:29
OLLIE KEARNS Thanks WR, interesting opinion
by SteveRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 14:29
Snowball Watching it again, Kebe did REALLY well, he had two men on him plus the keeper and an awkward ball to control.
by CMRoyal » 09 Mar 2009 14:33
Hoop BlahCMRoyalHoop Blah I'd argue that Long's challenge is an assist and again it highlights how limited stats can be. In most stats packages that wouldn't be classed as an assist (if recorded correctly) but without that key contribution the goal wouldn't have happened.
All these assist stats are so limited because they're usually just taken as the last attacking player to touch the ball before a goal is scored. Any one who knows anything about football is aware that that isn't always the key moment in the build up to a goal.
Agreed, and reflecting on this 'accidental' credit (which simultaneously negates MM's part in the goal), I'm not sure we can trust official stats on assists at all. They usually give us only a partial picture, and as demonstrated here can also be incorrect anyway.
Totally agree, and with Snowball further adding to them with his analysis of the OS match reports it doesn't make for the most accurate source for information.
Some of Snowball's indepth stats are still interesting though, as long as you don't treat them as gospell and base your opinions soley on their 'evidence.'
by Royal With Cheese » 09 Mar 2009 14:42
by cmonurz » 09 Mar 2009 15:09
Royal With Cheese So, after 712 posts, is he any good or not?
by papereyes » 09 Mar 2009 15:29
If we can sign Glen Little (presumably paying a large slice of his Premiership wage in the process) we could have plumbed the depths of other Prem squads for the variation we need up front.
by Hoop Blah » 09 Mar 2009 16:16
papereyesIf we can sign Glen Little (presumably paying a large slice of his Premiership wage in the process) we could have plumbed the depths of other Prem squads for the variation we need up front.
This.
It would, perhaps, be churlish of me to point out that one of the four goalscorers on Sat was a young Premiership team player on loan in the Championship.
The other youngster from that team, also on loan at a 'minor' league, looks a better player, admittedly, but the principle remains intact.
by Snowball » 09 Mar 2009 16:23
CMRoyal
As expected, the eyes have it!
by Snowball » 09 Mar 2009 16:25
Hoop Blah I'd argue that Long's challenge is an assist and again it highlights how limited stats can be. In most stats packages that wouldn't be classed as an assist (if recorded correctly) but without that key contribution the goal wouldn't have happened.
All these assist stats are so limited because they're usually just taken as the last attacking player to touch the ball before a goal is scored. Any one who knows anything about football is aware that that isn't always the key moment in the build up to a goal.
by papereyes » 09 Mar 2009 16:28
Hoop BlahpapereyesIf we can sign Glen Little (presumably paying a large slice of his Premiership wage in the process) we could have plumbed the depths of other Prem squads for the variation we need up front.
This.
It would, perhaps, be churlish of me to point out that one of the four goalscorers on Sat was a young Premiership team player on loan in the Championship.
The other youngster from that team, also on loan at a 'minor' league, looks a better player, admittedly, but the principle remains intact.
Derbyshire?
Not exactly the variation we're after though is he?
I agree with the point about getting in a young Premiership forward to give us that better mix upfront though. Can't name a specific player, but they're surely out there.
Users browsing this forum: Harborne Royal, On Strings and 252 guests