by Sun Tzu »
02 Jul 2009 15:28
RobRoyal Sun Tzu Deathy
Not with a year less on his contract it wont be.
Why not ?
Is he worse than he was last year ?
If we need a player NOW the length of his contract is irrelevant.
Wow, that's pretty breathtaking naivety
He'll be worth less because - presuming that he wishes to move on from Watford - he'll be available for nothing in 12 months. This puts Watford in a poor negotiating position - sell now, or have him for a year and lose out on the fee. We might need a player now, but we don't need Tommy Smith.
mmm, what an over simplistic view....
What you describe may be something that influences the decision, but football is to a large extent a short term game. Most people when they buy a player do so because they have a current need, not as a hedge. If you want a player you take a huge risk to think that if you wait a year you can get him for nothing. That year could see you drop a division, lose your job, the player lose form or make a huge improvement or someone else buy him.
Factor in that there is often competition for a player and that can easily over ride any effect that a contract is starting to run down.