by rob the royal » 14 Jan 2010 20:39
by rob the royal » 14 Jan 2010 20:41
Ian Royal Except they weren't assists. Rasiak could have half a dozen more crucial touches to his name that haven't been remembered.
by The whole year inn » 14 Jan 2010 21:24
SteveRoyalThe whole year inn Yep.
better results in the league will coincide with Pearce being dropped.
Or Mills being in.
Let's be honest, Pearce is just a younger and more inexperienced Ingimarsson.
by The whole year inn » 15 Jan 2010 08:16
Ian Royal Disagree. He is already Championship standard.
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 10:06
Dirk Gentlyrob the royal Kebe was ok but I reckon he could easily have been a bit more direct with his running - look at how easily Gunnar's was tearing them up!!! But it seemed like he just wanted to try and hang on to the ball for as long as possible when really he could have bagged himself a goal or set someone up.
But when you're winning away with 29 minutes left, hanging onto the ball for as long as possible is a much better tactic than taking a risk that is likely to give possession away.
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 10:08
Ian Royal Disagree. He is already Championship standard, but with a few rough edges. He'll never be good enough for the Prem though.
zummerset I am no Kebe fan but he played well against Pool and did some back tracking and tackling. Some comedy moments but good enough for Chanpionship. He needs someone to play with (like Rosenior) that he can develop an understanding with week on week. Nice one Jimmy.
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 15 Jan 2010 10:53
Hugo Boss So, a great result last night as we're all agreed... But WTF is Jimmy Kebe all about??
All he did last night was pussy-foot around, running it into touch when under no pressure and then when he did have a chance to kill the game off after we went 2-1 up, he somehow ends up turning back on himself and giving the ball away.
Absolute waste of space. Wants shooting.
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 10:57
by rob the royal » 15 Jan 2010 12:58
brendywendyDirk Gentlyrob the royal Kebe was ok but I reckon he could easily have been a bit more direct with his running - look at how easily Gunnar's was tearing them up!!! But it seemed like he just wanted to try and hang on to the ball for as long as possible when really he could have bagged himself a goal or set someone up.
But when you're winning away with 29 minutes left, hanging onto the ball for as long as possible is a much better tactic than taking a risk that is likely to give possession away.
'greed
and probably what he was told to do, not only that but exactly the same thing we were doing on the other wing too, but no ones moaning at them......
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 12:59
by rob the royal » 15 Jan 2010 13:13
brendywendy no
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 13:48
rob the royalbrendywendy no
ok i'll sum it up for you. i'm so fed up of people moaning about kebe, he did ok... blah blah blah.
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 13:49
by rob the royal » 15 Jan 2010 13:50
by brendywendy » 15 Jan 2010 14:06
Super Kevin Bremner!Hugo Boss So, a great result last night as we're all agreed... But WTF is Jimmy Kebe all about??
All he did last night was pussy-foot around, running it into touch when under no pressure and then when he did have a chance to kill the game off after we went 2-1 up, he somehow ends up turning back on himself and giving the ball away.
Absolute waste of space. Wants shooting.
When we want the opinion of a CheLOLsea supporter we'll let you know mate.
brendywendy yeah!
Users browsing this forum: GURoyal and 176 guests