by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 29 Aug 2010 15:31
by cmonurz » 29 Aug 2010 19:21
Row Z Royal He's not a big bully; he's a donkey. All I can say is LOL@ any team that concedes to him.
by Row Z Royal » 29 Aug 2010 19:23
cmonurzRow Z Royal He's not a big bully; he's a donkey. All I can say is LOL@ any team that concedes to him.
You haven't seen the goals that made up his hat-trick then.
by AbovetheI » 30 Aug 2010 00:00
by Big Foot » 30 Aug 2010 02:40
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe Some goods lols this thread.
by sheshnu » 30 Aug 2010 02:45
by readingbedding » 30 Aug 2010 10:20
by gazzer, loyal royal » 30 Aug 2010 10:25
readingbedding Don't think so, not in the same class atm, but he's a handful.
Big, hard, awkward target man.
Good in the air, don't know if in the class of Duncan Disorderly - but he'll be an absolute pain for defenders.
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 30 Aug 2010 10:44
Big FootSmoking Kills Dancing Doe Some goods lols this thread.
Why? Because he's scored in 2 consecutive games?
by Hoop Blah » 07 Nov 2010 21:44
Hoop Blah He's the big bully of a number 9 we've been missing since Shearer retired, or at least he could be if he keeps up this progress/form.
Why would you have a problem with that?
by frimmers3 » 07 Nov 2010 22:09
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 08 Nov 2010 13:12
Row Z RoyalHoop Blah He's had a good start to the season, if he keeps it up he'll be making the step up to the full England squad soon.
If Carroll plays for England then I'm going to buy an Argentina shirt and get "homo" printed on the back.
by Row Z Royal » 08 Nov 2010 14:21
Nick Shorey my Lord!Row Z RoyalHoop Blah He's had a good start to the season, if he keeps it up he'll be making the step up to the full England squad soon.
If Carroll plays for England then I'm going to buy an Argentina shirt and get "homo" printed on the back.
Starting saving for the letters![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/footbal ... 166622.stm
It might just happen...
by FiNeRaIn » 08 Nov 2010 17:18
by pea » 08 Nov 2010 17:37
by frimmers3 » 08 Nov 2010 17:57
by Row Z Royal » 08 Nov 2010 18:34
frimmers3 "This could be a U-turn of Frimmers-esque proportions." frimmers does not do "u" turns". his followers however are incapable of discerning the intent-of his posts,rather than the supposition.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 09 Nov 2010 11:26
Row Z Royalfrimmers3 "This could be a U-turn of Frimmers-esque proportions." frimmers does not do "u" turns". his followers however are incapable of discerning the intent-of his posts,rather than the supposition.
I take it back.
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 16 Nov 2010 08:47
by sheshnu » 16 Nov 2010 12:26
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests