by cmonurz » 17 Jan 2011 10:28
by ZacNaloen » 17 Jan 2011 10:28
by Royal Rother » 17 Jan 2011 10:29
Mr Angry As for Snowball, his attitude reminds me of a bloke who, after a few days of no rain, runs around telling everybody that its going to rain; after 6 months of drought, he is STILL running around saying the same thing "its gonna rain I tell ya!!"; eventually, the first drops fall, and the guy triumphantly exclaims "I TOLD YOU SO".
by ZacNaloen » 17 Jan 2011 10:33
Royal RotherMr Angry As for Snowball, his attitude reminds me of a bloke who, after a few days of no rain, runs around telling everybody that its going to rain; after 6 months of drought, he is STILL running around saying the same thing "its gonna rain I tell ya!!"; eventually, the first drops fall, and the guy triumphantly exclaims "I TOLD YOU SO".
Way way off the mark.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 17 Jan 2011 10:40
by Alan Partridge » 17 Jan 2011 10:52
by rhroyal » 17 Jan 2011 11:04
Snowballrhroyal
However hindsight is a wonderful gift. I remember the Derby match under Rodgers in which he came off the bench, got sent off and we went on to lose. If Snowball really claims to have seen him coming good so quickly after that, I don't believe him.
I have been championing Long since my first post on these boards in January 2009. I started a thread defending Shane and received a lot of stick for it.
by Snowball » 17 Jan 2011 11:19
T.R.O.L.I.Snowball There is only one "good" reason to criticise a player and that's for him not trying.
Unless the player is trying as hard as they can but it still isn't coming off for them - that was the original stance of my opening post on this thread. This was the gist of my first post on the thread - a post that I am extremely pleased Long has proved me wrong on.
by Snowball » 17 Jan 2011 11:27
Mr Angry The point is, that those of us who watched games could see that up to the end of November, Long was missing so many decent chances it was an embarrassment. Since then, he has started to score goals from chances that earlier in the season, he was missing.
Every Reading fan should be pleased he is doing the business now, but it doesn't negate that he had been poor before.
As for Snowball, his attitude reminds me of a bloke who, after a few days of no rain, runs around telling everybody that its going to rain; after 6 months of drought, he is STILL running around saying the same thing "its gonna rain I tell ya!!"; eventually, the first drops fall, and the guy triumphantly exclaims "I TOLD YOU SO".
by Vision » 17 Jan 2011 11:47
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Jan 2011 11:51
Vision Of course it could be argued that those who claimed Long failing to convert chances and score from open play was costing us have been just as vindicated by the events of recent weeks as those who denied it.
by Snowball » 17 Jan 2011 11:58
Vision Of course it could be argued that those who claimed Long failing to convert chances and score from open play was costing us have been just as vindicated by the events of recent weeks as those who denied it.
by Vision » 17 Jan 2011 12:12
Wycombe RoyalVision Of course it could be argued that those who claimed Long failing to convert chances and score from open play was costing us have been just as vindicated by the events of recent weeks as those who denied it.
I was one of those and I also highlighted that he wasn't taking up the right positions to get these chances. Before when he got into these one on one situations he just never looked like scoring, now he doesn't look like missing. I still don't think he is getting in the box enough, but whilst he is scoring I can live with that.......
by Vision » 17 Jan 2011 12:23
SnowballVision Of course it could be argued that those who claimed Long failing to convert chances and score from open play was costing us have been just as vindicated by the events of recent weeks as those who denied it.
Maybe, but it's still in part due to the coaching staff.
But if Long really "SHOULD HAVE" scored 8-10 goals in that barren spell, (and did) he'd be on 20-24 in all comps by now, and sold for 7 million.
A goal every other game OVERALL is brilliant.
Including Ireland Long has 14 in 28 (2) this season
by Man Friday » 17 Jan 2011 12:42
Snowball There is only one "good" reason to criticise a player and that's for him not trying.
by ZacNaloen » 17 Jan 2011 12:56
by facaldaqui » 17 Jan 2011 15:07
Vision If he'd scored 2-3 it would have made a big difference. For us it was 1 goal from open play in something like 20 games. My point was (as it was for others) that this was affecting him when given chances and also the team in not converting draws into wins. Its arguable that recent weeks show their opinion to have been every bit as vindicated as yours.
by Snowball » 17 Jan 2011 16:07
facaldaquiVision If he'd scored 2-3 it would have made a big difference. For us it was 1 goal from open play in something like 20 games. My point was (as it was for others) that this was affecting him when given chances and also the team in not converting draws into wins. Its arguable that recent weeks show their opinion to have been every bit as vindicated as yours.
Long's failure to score more than one open play goal over such a large number of matches may have cost us automatic promotion, however many he's scoring now. But his all-round play was good, so the problem was not so much Long as the misfiring of the strikers as a group. Inevitably, Long will hit a dry spell again--but this won't matter if other strikers are scoring. Brian has to get us an effective twin striking partnership fast--hopefully Williams or Manset might fit the bill. Otherwise we'll depend too much on Long, which is not a good idea.
by Alan Partridge » 17 Jan 2011 16:10
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jan 2011 16:20
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 372 guests