by Ian Royal » 03 Apr 2011 20:32
by Ferris » 04 Apr 2011 09:37
Ian Royal McAnuff has more assists and I think he has been involved in the build up for more goals. Kebe is a fantastic winger and yes he's scored more goals certainly. But I just think that McAnuff is more important to us and is the better all round player. When he isn't creating chances I still think he contributes a lot, whereas when Kebe has a bad game and isn't beating people and putting good balls in, he's a bit of a waste of a player.
Kebe will beat people more often and I agree is a great entertainer. But he's definitely an individual and I see McAnuff as more crucial to the Team.
I think that's an extremely generous bambionicelegsography for McAnuff. I'm not sure he rates more than a 1.
by brendywendy » 04 Apr 2011 10:13
Ian Royal McAnuff has more assists and I think he has been involved in the build up for more goals. Kebe is a fantastic winger and yes he's scored more goals certainly. But I just think that McAnuff is more important to us and is the better all round player. When he isn't creating chances I still think he contributes a lot, whereas when Kebe has a bad game and isn't beating people and putting good balls in, he's a bit of a waste of a player.
Kebe will beat people more often and I agree is a great entertainer. But he's definitely an individual and I see McAnuff as more crucial to the Team.
I think that's an extremely generous bambionicelegsography for McAnuff. I'm not sure he rates more than a 1.
by Svlad Cjelli » 04 Apr 2011 14:04
FerrisIan Royal McAnuff has more assists and I think he has been involved in the build up for more goals. Kebe is a fantastic winger and yes he's scored more goals certainly. But I just think that McAnuff is more important to us and is the better all round player. When he isn't creating chances I still think he contributes a lot, whereas when Kebe has a bad game and isn't beating people and putting good balls in, he's a bit of a waste of a player.
Kebe will beat people more often and I agree is a great entertainer. But he's definitely an individual and I see McAnuff as more crucial to the Team.
I think that's an extremely generous bambionicelegsography for McAnuff. I'm not sure he rates more than a 1.
This. McAnuff will always put in a shift, even if things aren't coming off for him.
by brendywendy » 04 Apr 2011 14:52
by Ian Royal » 04 Apr 2011 17:14
by roadrunner » 04 Apr 2011 17:58
brendywendy most over rated player here imo.
and please stop saying such things about jimmy kebe, footballing god.
by Matt de K » 04 Apr 2011 19:53
roadrunnerbrendywendy most over rated player here imo.
and please stop saying such things about jimmy kebe, footballing god.
When he turns up. He goes missing far too often for too long a period. He had a great run last season, one or two good games this season but has pretty much been anonymous. There is no excuse for a player of his ability not turning in quality performances week in week out; that's what separates the top players from the rest.
by pea » 05 Apr 2011 00:26
by FiNeRaIn » 05 Apr 2011 01:00
by Row Z Royal » 05 Apr 2011 08:15
roadrunnerbrendywendy most over rated player here imo.
and please stop saying such things about jimmy kebe, footballing god.
When he turns up. He goes missing far too often for too long a period.
by brendywendy » 05 Apr 2011 11:24
roadrunnerbrendywendy most over rated player here imo.
and please stop saying such things about jimmy kebe, footballing god.
When he turns up. He goes missing far too often for too long a period. He had a great run last season, one or two good games this season but has pretty much been anonymous. There is no excuse for a player of his ability not turning in quality performances week in week out; that's what separates the top players from the rest.
by brendywendy » 05 Apr 2011 11:25
pea Kebe is far more legendary but McAnuff would be on the teamsheet before him every time for me.
The amount of balls McAnuff has slipped through defences for Long to run behind them for and usually scored or won a freekick/pen is impressive and McAnuff get plenty of assists.
The crosses he whipped in for Long's second against Derby and Hunts goal against Palace are better than any cross Kebe has ever put in.
by brendywendy » 05 Apr 2011 11:25
Row Z Royalroadrunnerbrendywendy most over rated player here imo.
and please stop saying such things about jimmy kebe, footballing god.
When he turns up. He goes missing far too often for too long a period.
Sounds like a decent definition of a god to me.
by pea » 05 Apr 2011 17:50
brendywendypea Kebe is far more legendary but McAnuff would be on the teamsheet before him every time for me.
The amount of balls McAnuff has slipped through defences for Long to run behind them for and usually scored or won a freekick/pen is impressive and McAnuff get plenty of assists.
The crosses he whipped in for Long's second against Derby and Hunts goal against Palace are better than any cross Kebe has ever put in.
im sorry- but if howard is our leading assister, and hes only played ~ 3 and a half games, i dont see how you can say jobi gets tons of assists.
by Mike Hunt » 06 Apr 2011 01:55
peabrendywendypea Kebe is far more legendary but McAnuff would be on the teamsheet before him every time for me.
The amount of balls McAnuff has slipped through defences for Long to run behind them for and usually scored or won a freekick/pen is impressive and McAnuff get plenty of assists.
The crosses he whipped in for Long's second against Derby and Hunts goal against Palace are better than any cross Kebe has ever put in.
im sorry- but if howard is our leading assister, and hes only played ~ 3 and a half games, i dont see how you can say jobi gets tons of assists.
err i didnt
by leicsRoyal » 06 Apr 2011 09:22
DOYLERSAROYALER ...not a progressive move in terms of club, and why would he want to move to city of Leicester????????????
by brendywendy » 06 Apr 2011 09:33
Mike Huntpeabrendywendy im sorry- but if howard is our leading assister, and hes only played ~ 3 and a half games, i dont see how you can say jobi gets tons of assists.
err i didnt
I know that Plenty does not = tons pea, but you are implying that he has gotten a lot of assists...
plen·ty (plnt)
n.
1. A full or completely adequate amount or supply
by leicsRoyal » 06 Apr 2011 09:38
by brendywendy » 06 Apr 2011 09:39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests