by Royal Lady » 03 May 2011 15:29
by leicsRoyal » 03 May 2011 15:35
by Gordons Cumming » 03 May 2011 15:45
by Svlad Cjelli » 03 May 2011 15:47
by Gordons Cumming » 03 May 2011 15:49
Svlad Cjelli Just playing devil's advocate here, is there much difference between Fourlin being partly-or-wholly owned by a third-party in Argentina and Craig Bellamy being wholly owned by a third-party in Manchester?
by daveb76 » 03 May 2011 15:51
leicsRoyal To be honest with you Dave,
You have obviously been the best team in the league this year and maybe harsh for you not to go up.
But rules are rules and you could argue that by falsifying the documents the club have committed fraud of major proportions when considered the money that the club now stand to gain.
by leicsRoyal » 03 May 2011 15:53
daveb76leicsRoyal To be honest with you Dave,
You have obviously been the best team in the league this year and maybe harsh for you not to go up.
But rules are rules and you could argue that by falsifying the documents the club have committed fraud of major proportions when considered the money that the club now stand to gain.
all depends on what has actually happened which no one knows for sure, if the crime is as serious as some suggest and we are guilty then as much as it's a kick in the nuts for us fans I can understand why the fa would hit us hard. I'm not so sure the crimes, if proved, are serious enough to warrant a heavy sanction. We shall see though, I am hopeful the club can prove they are innocent not just so we go up but to avoid absolute chaos for the rest of the league that would follow.
by daveb76 » 03 May 2011 15:55
Svlad Cjelli Just playing devil's advocate here, is there much difference between Fourlin being partly-or-wholly owned by a third-party in Argentina and Craig Bellamy being wholly owned by a third-party in Manchester?
by readingbedding » 03 May 2011 16:04
by Royal Rother » 03 May 2011 16:05
floyd__streeteRoyal Rother It won't be a 15 point deduction now - relegation of 1 or 2 divisions fits the bill nicely.
Excuse me for refusing to trust your ever-faulty crystall ball
by moo » 03 May 2011 16:10
by moo » 03 May 2011 16:14
moo The betting odds keeping changing in Norwich's favour.
Currently on Betfair
QPR 1.94
Norwich 1.94
by Ian Royal » 03 May 2011 17:11
by PEARCEY » 03 May 2011 17:27
Ian Royal Has anyone noticed who would be the major beneficiary of QPR getting an automatic relegation?
Sheffield Utd!![]()
It is for this reason alone that I hope QPR get relegated to League One as it would be hilarious that it happens to Colin again and this time Sheffield get saved by it.![]()
by leicsRoyal » 03 May 2011 17:28
Ian Royal Has anyone noticed who would be the major beneficiary of QPR getting an automatic relegation?
Sheffield Utd!![]()
It is for this reason alone that I hope QPR get relegated to League One as it would be hilarious that it happens to Colin again and this time Sheffield get saved by it.![]()
by PEARCEY » 03 May 2011 17:36
moo The betting odds keeping changing in Norwich's favour.
Currently on Betfair
QPR 1.94
Norwich 1.94
by Snowball » 03 May 2011 18:30
Ian Royal Has anyone noticed who would be the major beneficiary of QPR getting an automatic relegation?
Sheffield Utd!![]()
It is for this reason alone that I hope QPR get relegated to League One as it would be hilarious that it happens to Colin again and this time Sheffield get saved by it.![]()
by Royal Rother » 03 May 2011 18:44
by moo » 03 May 2011 18:49
Royal Rother I wish I'd put my money where my mouth has been for the last month!
by PEARCEY » 03 May 2011 18:52
Royal Rother I wish I'd put my money where my mouth has been for the last month!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Snowflake Royal, WestYorksRoyal and 268 guests