
by savage 4 england » 22 Aug 2011 18:28
by ZacNaloen » 22 Aug 2011 18:29
by ZacNaloen » 22 Aug 2011 18:36
by Ferris » 22 Aug 2011 18:44
by Ian Royal » 22 Aug 2011 18:52
ZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
by Royals-lad14 » 22 Aug 2011 18:52
by Snowball » 22 Aug 2011 18:53
Avon RoyalRow Z RoyalSnowball Is it my imagination or do we have the players for 5-3-2, maybe next season?
Cummings RB but can play RM, Mills LB but can play LM
-----------McCarthy or Feds
Cummings Pearce Morrison/Harte Khumalo J-Mills
Elwood Karacan
-----Kebe -------- Hunt/Manset -------HRK
I don't think we'll get away with 14 players on the pitch m8.
And we'd probably still lose even if we did.
by tomrfcurz » 22 Aug 2011 19:06
by pea » 22 Aug 2011 19:24
FiNeRaIn 1 year contract? Wow, talk about having faith in the player. Whatever happened to straight 3 year contracts when you thought a player would be good enough...you want them tied down.
by Friday's Legacy » 22 Aug 2011 20:02
Ian RoyalZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
From MaccyD's comments this was a relatively recent thing (the WIP signing), but I agree we'd obviously been talking a couple of months ago.
FiNeRaIn 1 year contract? Wow, talk about having faith in the player. Whatever happened to straight 3 year contracts when you thought a player would be good enough...you want them tied down.
by RoyalBlue » 22 Aug 2011 20:20
Friday's LegacyIan RoyalZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
From MaccyD's comments this was a relatively recent thing (the WIP signing), but I agree we'd obviously been talking a couple of months ago.
we were in talks with him for 3 weeks.FiNeRaIn 1 year contract? Wow, talk about having faith in the player. Whatever happened to straight 3 year contracts when you thought a player would be good enough...you want them tied down.
it's effectively a 2 year contract if we take the second year option. the boy has a contract to play for. that's motivation. that's better than the over-paid dross who turn up every week and under perform.
Ark Royal Reckon that BMcD has looked at this as partly solving solving his centre-back problem. Mills will go in at left back and Harte will move to the centre either as first choice or cover for Pearce and Khumalo.
by roadrunner » 22 Aug 2011 20:30
RoyalBlue The second year option is a one way thing?He has to stay if we take it?
Anyway we don't really have a good record for honouring option deals - ask Salako.
by soggy biscuit » 22 Aug 2011 20:32
Big Foot LOL are we in the business of signing players who've got a kunt of a brother?
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Aug 2011 21:04
ZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
by Avon Royal » 22 Aug 2011 21:24
FiNeRaInZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
He left for both money AND ambition - why are people having trouble understanding this?
by Ian Royal » 22 Aug 2011 22:00
FiNeRaInZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
He left for both money AND ambition - why are people having trouble understanding this?
by paultheroyal » 22 Aug 2011 22:10
by Simon's Church » 22 Aug 2011 22:18
paultheroyal Matt Mills getting his own back on Reading and it's fans by bigging up his brother!! Gonna get messy.
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Aug 2011 22:33
Ian RoyalFiNeRaInZacNaloen I was aware we were in talks from Matt Mills twitter, it's the reason I thought him leaving was a non-starter initially. He said he wanted to play in the same team as him. But then it turned out he followed the money using the excuse of ambition.
He left for both money AND ambition - why are people having trouble understanding this?
Hows that working for him? Lost to a shit side, lost to a decent side, drew with a decent side, beat a shit side.
We on the other hand, have lost to a shit side, lost to a decent side, drew with a decent side and beat promotion favourites.
by Big Ern » 23 Aug 2011 00:36
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 286 guests