by readingbedding » 21 Nov 2011 10:42
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 10:43
by readingbedding » 21 Nov 2011 10:53
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 11:03
by readingbedding » 21 Nov 2011 11:11
by readingbedding » 21 Nov 2011 11:19
by under the tin » 21 Nov 2011 11:25
Svlad Cjelli but it's the reality of life for a team of our size, the way football is structured and financed today.
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Nov 2011 11:31
by melonhead » 21 Nov 2011 11:46
Svlad Cjelli Absolutely, and it's gutting when you watch Motd and see Shorey cross for Long to score (like seeing a couple of ex-girlfriends you loved take part in a threesome with someone else) - but it's the reality of life for a team of our size, the way football is structured and financed today.
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Nov 2011 12:06
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 12:08
Terminal Boardom Thing is, how many times did Shorey play in Long for any Reading goals?
by Hoop Blah » 21 Nov 2011 12:18
Svlad Cjelli For "sold", read "unable to stop moving on."
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 12:20
Hoop BlahSvlad Cjelli For "sold", read "unable to stop moving on."
Or read "didn't do anything to encourage them to stay because you quite like the look of the incoming transfer fee".
by melonhead » 21 Nov 2011 12:23
by Hoop Blah » 21 Nov 2011 12:23
by melonhead » 21 Nov 2011 12:34
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 12:34
Hoop Blah I'm not saying that we shouldn't have cashed in but there is a fair argument that in the cases of Long and Sigurdsson we didn't have to sell them and that there was a possibility that neither were really pushing for that move you seem to say was unstoppable.
How hard did we try and stop them then?
by RoyalBlue » 21 Nov 2011 12:45
Svlad Cjelli For "sold", read "unable to stop moving on."
readingbedding More and more we're consolidating ourselves as a Championship team.
by Svlad Cjelli » 21 Nov 2011 12:54
RoyalBlueSvlad Cjelli For "sold", read "unable to stop moving on."
That didn't stop us spending the money received though did it?
So just change the headline to 'Took the money for 80 goals and only reinvested enough for 20'.
by Terminal Boardom » 21 Nov 2011 13:01
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Biscuit goalie, Freddy, From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Hove Royal, katweslowski, Orion1871, rabidbee, Rax, Richard, Sutekh, tidus_mi2, Tinpot Royal, UpThePrem, WestYorksRoyal and 312 guests