winchester_royalNo Hoops
Brilliant, just what you want to hear! All 27 mins of it!!
Loved the bit about Anton and Brian talking about football to 1am!
No chance of the owner meddling in team affairs then...

by Uke » 24 Jan 2012 19:07
winchester_royalNo Hoops
Brilliant, just what you want to hear! All 27 mins of it!!
Loved the bit about Anton and Brian talking about football to 1am!
by chilipepper91 » 24 Jan 2012 19:12
by winchester_royal » 24 Jan 2012 19:13
Uke
No chance of the owner meddling in team affairs then...
by Friday's Legacy » 24 Jan 2012 19:15
by Friday's Legacy » 24 Jan 2012 19:17
philM Is the "long term plan to expand the stadium to 38K" the same capacity as the original planning application?
by West Stand Flash » 24 Jan 2012 19:18
Friday's Legacy having just watched south today, i almost feel like they're aiming too high, but if they can match their words with money then jesus christ we're in for one hell of a ride.
"we're going to aim for mid table in the premiership to begin with, then cups and european football"
I need to sit down.
by Man Friday » 24 Jan 2012 19:20
by Ian Royal » 24 Jan 2012 19:20
by Chaney » 24 Jan 2012 19:21
by Platypuss » 25 Jan 2012 07:16
by Uke » 25 Jan 2012 07:22
Platypuss Successful, but not successful enough to get promoted to the Prem? Tough criteria, Uke!
by ZacNaloen » 25 Jan 2012 07:34
by exileinleeds » 25 Jan 2012 08:35
UkePlatypuss Successful, but not successful enough to get promoted to the Prem? Tough criteria, Uke!
It's hard to think of any foreign owned clubs with "rich owners" doing well and surviving outside the Prem though
Care to name any?
The new Messiahs have to perform some long lasting miracles before I believe in them with the blind faith some people have on here based on a press conference of platitudes
by Uke » 25 Jan 2012 09:06
exileinleedsUkePlatypuss Successful, but not successful enough to get promoted to the Prem? Tough criteria, Uke!
It's hard to think of any foreign owned clubs with "rich owners" doing well and surviving outside the Prem though
Care to name any?
The new Messiahs have to perform some long lasting miracles before I believe in them with the blind faith some people have on here based on a press conference of platitudes
Would you prefer a nice British owner.... Mike Ashley, Simon Jordan- hell, why not Simon Cowell?
Whilst I share everyones concern that the new owners are not about to shaft us, realistically there are few people in the UK who have the necessary funds. Consult the Times rich list and select one whom you would prefer!
SJM - or Mr Ego as the clever ones here have called him- is a very far from stupid man. Hands up who here could have achieved a tenth of what he has, given the same background and circumstances? Or any others come to that.
He is justifiably proud of his achievements. Is it ego that made him name the stadium after himself? If it is, so what? He is synonymous with Reading. Everyone has heard of Madejeski and Reading because of him. How many football club chairmen can say that? In all honesty how many club chairmen (especially lower league) can you name? Yet everyone knows Reading = Madejeski. Pundits have even learned how to pronounce it.
Do you really think that he wants that reputation ruined? I cannot conceive that he would be naive or stupid enough not to have fully investigated the background and intent of his new partners. So much so that he is staying around to continue to give his experience and guidance. Samuelson may be an expert financier and business man, Madejeski is also an expert and very successful football club chairman, and I couldn't be more delighted we are not going to lose him.
If you consider Madejeski the man, not the money machine, he is into his 70's and must be IHT planning. Would you prefer that he made a planned, staged, considered handover to a suitable, solvent successor. Imagine where we would be if he had a sudden heart attack and his shares were handed to.....
I trust SJM that he has done the seemingly impossible- found a perfect successor in his own mould. Someone with the vision to see what Reading could be, and that with sensible prudent and timely investment management, a very good return can be made, while the fans are in for exciting times.
#partyinglikeits1991
by exileinleeds » 25 Jan 2012 09:38
Uke I don't disagree with you though, this could well be good for the club
Rich benefactors (whatever nationality) don't seem to work these days. In fact SJM is perhaps one of the few that did
The new group is not like SJM - they are a faceless consortium (TSI) which can go broke just like any other limited Company - we only know two people who work for this "group".
It is better he sold now and managed the transition, but as Baines also pointed out about 50 pages back, he may have been under pressure to sell from his interests outside the club.
I'm just more concerned about the greeting of the new Messiah. I'm happy to welcome him, but won't hail him as such yet.
He may just be a very naughty boy, given the track records of other Messiahs
by Vision » 25 Jan 2012 11:11
melonheadTerminal Boardomexileinleeds
TSI may be a "faceless consortium" to us, but I am guessing they are not to SJM.
It was suggested early that a DM scoop prompted the outing of this deal ahead of their intended release date- that is plausable. It is unlike SJM to conduct business in public, however it is great to know of the HoA. It also apparently has convinced JK to commit- and who knows who else it might be being dangled in front of....
For those unaware of the term, it is a statement of agreement of the deal they want. It will contain details of funds, responsibilities, expectations- and evidence based. I cannot imagine SJM signing on a promise that funds will appear.
He will also be around (as will everyone else) to oversee what happens. He is not known for taking excessive risks, and I can see no way he would be talking to people who think it a good idea to mortgage/sell the ground to have a pop at CL football. Nor can I see Nicky Hammond suddenly spending £5m on an unknown son of a arms dealer, who never seems to make the bench.
For the record, many on here seem to confuse "Due Diligence" with some sort of "fit and proper" test. It isn't. Due Diligence is a task undertaken by lawyers and accountants that is essentially going through all the books and contracts and ensuring that things are as they have been presented.
SJM will have valued the club based on the assets and liabilities- an army of pen pushers will be checking that these are accurate, making sure they are aware of add-on clauses, on-going payments due on previous transfers....that the photocopiers are owned and not leased. Both sides will be making sure that there are no nasty surprises.
<<Pedant mode on>>
SJM was born in Stoke and named John HUrst. He changed his name. He is as Polish as my left gonad.
<<Pedant mode off>>
did your left gonad have a polish father?
by Yorkshire Royal » 25 Jan 2012 11:12
mr_number With Maccy D being given "the exact transfer budget" he asked for, but "not being allowed to break the wage structure", will he do the thing you used to be able to do on Champ Man, and offer massive signing on bonuses to make up for a short fall in wages?
by Bandini » 25 Jan 2012 11:13
Yorkshire Royalmr_number With Maccy D being given "the exact transfer budget" he asked for, but "not being allowed to break the wage structure", will he do the thing you used to be able to do on Champ Man, and offer massive signing on bonuses to make up for a short fall in wages?
That's how Stoke keep their wage structure in place.
by Maguire » 25 Jan 2012 11:34
VisionZacNaloen My opinion of Dirks post on Tilehurst end, talk about rewriting history?
Madejski financed this club with a mixture of wages and infrastructure and purchasing power to get us promoted. And this is exactly how these guys claim they are intending to finance the club. When they say they won't break the wage structure and the ethos will remain the same, whilst investing in the academy stadium etc that is exactly what they mean.
And this is exactly what John Madejski did, but for a much smaller club that grew under his tenure.
I think you're right about re-writing history but in another way as well.
In the championship perhaps we've gone about in a more prudent manner but in the 3rd tier we paid way above what would be considered prudent in order to get into the Championship. It was a calculated risk but it was not far off the same gamble as we criticise others for doing and indeed the sort of thing people seem worried about us doing now.
Not saying they're not right to voice some concerns but it's a bit hypocritical and smacks of selective memory too when it comes to Madejski's MO under Burns and Pardew in the 3rd tier.
by Ian Royal » 25 Jan 2012 11:34
VisionBandini ^ a calculated gamble, but with lower stakes.
Indeed but equally with higher rewards now though.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], katweslowski, MartinRdg, tidus_mi2 and 910 guests