by FiNeRaIn » 22 Feb 2012 11:38
by ellpryjon » 22 Feb 2012 11:43
Sure - on Monday we were told McDermott was going to Wolves, later it transpired he had met with Madejski etc who were keen to keep him after the approach. Yesterday McDermott was offered a new 3 1/2 year deal on much improved terms to stay at Reading and shun Wolves.
by Silver Fox » 22 Feb 2012 11:43
FiNeRaIn That pic stopped being funny YEARS ago. its utterly boring when it appears every time wolves are mentioned.
Our play-off record is actually worse than theirs now so it would probably be more appropriate for us to fly when we lose this years play-offs.
by Mr Optimist » 22 Feb 2012 11:44
by Simon's Church » 22 Feb 2012 11:44
melonheadSimon's Church No nobody else on this list has ever had their doubts about the takeover
'CK OFF!
by Hoop Blah » 22 Feb 2012 11:46
Norfolk Royal Although it would have been very simple at any stage for McDermott to make a public statement saying he was staying at Reading.
by soggy biscuit » 22 Feb 2012 11:46
Mr Optimist Personally I like seeing the picture and I think you are missing the point massively here.
I will explain it for you.
It is funny because they pride themselves on their magnificant support, however, this loyal fan has gone to a play off semi-final with a banner with that message that he must have prepared before the match and brought in with him on the off-chance the result didn't go their way.
It is therefore pre-meditated negativity and has gone to the match with this mindset, which I would say is the absolute opposite of providing support to your team.
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Feb 2012 11:48
Silver FoxFiNeRaIn That pic stopped being funny YEARS ago. its utterly boring when it appears every time wolves are mentioned.
Our play-off record is actually worse than theirs now so it would probably be more appropriate for us to fly when we lose this years play-offs.
Would you like to be directed to the point that you've so clearly missed?
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Feb 2012 11:49
Mr Optimist Personally I like seeing the picture and I think you are missing the point massively here.
I will explain it for you.
It is funny because they pride themselves on their magnificant support, however, this loyal fan has gone to a play off semi-final with a banner with that message that he must have prepared before the match and brought in with him on the off-chance the result didn't go their way.
It is therefore pre-meditated negativity and has gone to the match with this mindset, which I would say is the absolute opposite of providing support to your team.
by The Prisoner » 22 Feb 2012 11:51
by Ian Royal » 22 Feb 2012 11:52
by Mr Optimist » 22 Feb 2012 11:52
soggy biscuitMr Optimist Personally I like seeing the picture and I think you are missing the point massively here.
I will explain it for you.
It is funny because they pride themselves on their magnificant support, however, this loyal fan has gone to a play off semi-final with a banner with that message that he must have prepared before the match and brought in with him on the off-chance the result didn't go their way.
It is therefore pre-meditated negativity and has gone to the match with this mindset, which I would say is the absolute opposite of providing support to your team.
2nd leg of play offs, they were hammered in the first leg
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Feb 2012 11:55
Ian Royal don't like it, don't look. The rest of us are mildly entertained by it.
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 22 Feb 2012 11:56
FiNeRaInIan Royal don't like it, don't look. The rest of us are mildly entertained by it.
I guess even simpletons find the same joke funny 500 times. Continue all.
by sandman » 22 Feb 2012 11:57
by FiNeRaIn » 22 Feb 2012 11:58
by TBM » 22 Feb 2012 11:59
Uke It's the Birmingham City connection they don't like
by MmmMonsterMunch » 22 Feb 2012 12:01
Ian Royal don't like it, don't look. The rest of us are mildly entertained by it.
by tee peg » 22 Feb 2012 12:02
MmmMonsterMunchIan Royal don't like it, don't look. The rest of us are mildly entertained by it.
Never mind mildly - I find it hugely entertaining. In fact can someone post it again please?
by TBM » 22 Feb 2012 12:03
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests