Speculation - Matt Jarvis

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11702
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: Speculation - Matt Jarvis

by Franchise FC » 23 Apr 2012 06:17

Royals-lad14 Jarvis would be a great signing, fletcher i think is out of our reach as he will go to a top 10 club IMO, so by saying coz they got relegated they may not be good enough for premier league, look at blackburn, Yakubu and Hoilett carry that team


And guess where they're headed.

Royals-lad14
Member
Posts: 645
Joined: 05 Feb 2010 21:07

Re: Speculation - Matt Jarvis

by Royals-lad14 » 23 Apr 2012 16:04

coz the rest of the players are utter bollocks :roll:

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11702
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: Speculation - Matt Jarvis

by Franchise FC » 23 Apr 2012 16:31

Royals-lad14 coz the rest of the players are not even utter bollocks :roll:


Corrected for you

rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: Speculation - Matt Jarvis

by rhroyal » 23 Apr 2012 21:05

glosson Jarvis is quality. Kightly was looking good once he got regular playing time and showed a strong work ethic. I would imagine Jarvis would be sought after by some mid-table prem teams though, no?

Good shout on Kightly; he was looking bright. Injury prone though.

To say that a player's not good enough if he's been relegated is a ridiculous thing to say by the way. We've all been heralding how the team means more than the players with our promotion. That can work in a bad way too. Good players with good attitudes can be caught in the wrong team; doesn't make them bad players.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

It is currently 22 May 2025 00:38