by facaldaqui » 14 Jun 2012 10:41
by Once were Biscuitmen » 14 Jun 2012 10:43
by Gordons Cumming » 14 Jun 2012 10:55
by specialjon » 14 Jun 2012 11:49
by Dare to Dr£am » 14 Jun 2012 12:26
by Ghost Royal » 14 Jun 2012 12:39
by LanercostRoyal » 14 Jun 2012 14:16
by loyalroyal4life » 14 Jun 2012 15:12
by Ian Royal » 14 Jun 2012 17:08
facaldaqui I'm all in favour of not being held to ransom, and all that. We've sold a string of championship players over the last few years for what seems like a standard rate of 3 million. But to buy equivalent players, we bid 2 million. To be fair, most of the ones (bar Gylfi) we sold for 3 or more million weren't worth it, but we need to get some new players from somewhere.
by facaldaqui » 14 Jun 2012 17:42
Ian Royalfacaldaqui I'm all in favour of not being held to ransom, and all that. We've sold a string of championship players over the last few years for what seems like a standard rate of 3 million. But to buy equivalent players, we bid 2 million. To be fair, most of the ones (bar Gylfi) we sold for 3 or more million weren't worth it, but we need to get some new players from somewhere.
Do you not think that 14 June is a little early to be complaining about us not having paid for players? Especially with a major international tournament currently in play?
by Ian Royal » 14 Jun 2012 17:52
by facaldaqui » 14 Jun 2012 18:02
Ian Royal As things progress new players will become available, or will come to our attention. It's extremely early days anyway. We'll miss some players we'd like, we'll get some. It's unwarranted pessimism.
We didn't do badly when signing Gorkss in August, by your way of thinking he must have been well down the shortlist!
by Avon Royal » 15 Jun 2012 07:37
by Alf Hooker » 15 Jun 2012 09:30
Avon Royal West Ham are buying players, Saints are buying players, we are not.
Guess who is most likely to struggle.........
by Silver Fox » 15 Jun 2012 10:11
Avon Royal West Ham are buying players, Saints are buying players, we are not.
Guess who is most likely to struggle.........
by Royal Ginger » 15 Jun 2012 11:17
by Gordons Cumming » 15 Jun 2012 11:28
by who are ya? » 15 Jun 2012 11:34
Avon Royal West Ham are buying players, Saints are buying players, we are not.
Guess who is most likely to struggle.........
by Dare to Dr£am » 15 Jun 2012 12:46
Avon Royal West Ham are buying players, Saints are buying players, we are not.
Guess who is most likely to struggle.........
by Forbury Lion » 15 Jun 2012 13:31
Didn't we get Gorks because Southampton were messing about on the deal so Neil Warnock phones Brian McDermott and asked him if he was interested, Then told Gorks he'd fit in better there and told him to detour.facaldaquiIan Royal As things progress new players will become available, or will come to our attention. It's extremely early days anyway. We'll miss some players we'd like, we'll get some. It's unwarranted pessimism.
We didn't do badly when signing Gorkss in August, by your way of thinking he must have been well down the shortlist!
I'm not being pessimistic. Being tight hasn't done us any harm recently.
As for Gorkss, the reason we didn't buy Gorkss till the last minute was that we couldn't afford to till then. It wasn't optimal: we could have done with him a few matches earlier. I don't want us buying players in late August. We have some money and don't have to walk a tightrope this year.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RFCMod, Who Moved The Goalposts? and 808 guests