by Blakey's Right Peg » 30 Jun 2012 14:35
by paultheroyal » 30 Jun 2012 14:41
cmonurz Well I quite like them. We got panels, this is good.
by larry1971 » 30 Jun 2012 14:50
MmmMonsterMunch The away shirt is exactly the same as Coventry then...
by Terminal Boardom » 30 Jun 2012 14:54
by barmy_army008 » 30 Jun 2012 14:56
by larry1971 » 30 Jun 2012 14:58
RoyalBlue The home kit is complete and utter shyte! Perfect perhaps for QPR but awful for the true hoops.![]()
And those awful blue bands (American obese hoops) are mroe at home on a sodding rugby shirt than a football kit.
Those responsible at Puma and the club should be shot - utter morons.
F*ck off Puma, shit designs and shit quality.
Bring back Mizuno!
by RFCUK » 30 Jun 2012 15:20
by JayRoyal » 30 Jun 2012 16:06
RFCUK Surely the club get offered templates, along with what can and can't be changed in terms of pattern and colour..
So for the home shirt we went for the design template same as Watford, Greenock etc etc.. It should then be up to the club what colours they put where, and where the badge goes?
So the club decided badge in the middle, red on the sleeve, and then thick hoops.. Look at Greenock.. Same template, but they decided to go with smaller hoops..
I personally think with more and thinner hoops and a badge not in the middle, this could have been one of our great kits..
Jay, can you mock up what it would have looked like with a normal badge and more hoops..? That would have been a dream kit, along with white shirts and socks..
by Blakey's Right Peg » 30 Jun 2012 16:11
by JayRoyal » 30 Jun 2012 16:14
by RFCUK » 30 Jun 2012 16:27
JayRoyalRFCUK Surely the club get offered templates, along with what can and can't be changed in terms of pattern and colour..
So for the home shirt we went for the design template same as Watford, Greenock etc etc.. It should then be up to the club what colours they put where, and where the badge goes?
So the club decided badge in the middle, red on the sleeve, and then thick hoops.. Look at Greenock.. Same template, but they decided to go with smaller hoops..
I personally think with more and thinner hoops and a badge not in the middle, this could have been one of our great kits..
Jay, can you mock up what it would have looked like with a normal badge and more hoops..? That would have been a dream kit, along with white shirts and socks..
by Terminal Boardom » 30 Jun 2012 16:29
RFCUKJayRoyalRFCUK Surely the club get offered templates, along with what can and can't be changed in terms of pattern and colour..
So for the home shirt we went for the design template same as Watford, Greenock etc etc.. It should then be up to the club what colours they put where, and where the badge goes?
So the club decided badge in the middle, red on the sleeve, and then thick hoops.. Look at Greenock.. Same template, but they decided to go with smaller hoops..
I personally think with more and thinner hoops and a badge not in the middle, this could have been one of our great kits..
Jay, can you mock up what it would have looked like with a normal badge and more hoops..? That would have been a dream kit, along with white shirts and socks..
That's brilliant, cheers for that. I honestly think that's a quality shirt
by Stranded » 30 Jun 2012 16:40
by NattMiles » 30 Jun 2012 22:48
by RockheadRumple » 30 Jun 2012 22:51
by FRIDDY109 » 30 Jun 2012 22:55
NattMiles
by Ian Royal » 01 Jul 2012 01:13
by Pandoras Box » 01 Jul 2012 09:39
by Avon Royal » 01 Jul 2012 12:05
by RFCUK » 01 Jul 2012 12:20
Ian Royal I really don't get the hate for the red shoulder patch.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests