TheSiege
Have you forgotten his whole career as a striker - you know, the guy who puts the ball in the net! Stats please!
You are right of course. 100 + goals in the premier league is poor.
by sputnik » 14 Aug 2012 22:17
TheSiege
Have you forgotten his whole career as a striker - you know, the guy who puts the ball in the net! Stats please!
by Millsy » 14 Aug 2012 22:56
by sputnik » 15 Aug 2012 22:27
TheSiege His best performances were in his early days at Norwich.
TheSiege That is if your 100 goals is correct!
by sputnik » 15 Aug 2012 22:57
TheSiege I also note that you have serially failed to answer the basic question
by GSY-Royal » 16 Aug 2012 01:37
TheSiege Correct - Leicester not Norwich. A lot of my lifetime has been attuned to looking at the situations surrounding decent strikers and - of course, Heskey was never one of those. I admit my mistake but - who gives a sh*t! Crap from Norwich may be wrong but crap from Leicester is little different. Which bit do you not understand? Heskey earned vast quantities of money for a/ Being a footballer. and B/ Being a scorer of goals. If you look at his response to the vast quantity of money he acquired you will realise he was a con-artist! Imagine Usain Bolt doing the 100 metres in 13 secondes - None of us would know his name. Heskey is lucky, he is a serial failure and there are still morons who will make his case despite reality.
by Extended-Phenotype » 16 Aug 2012 08:32
by MouldyRoyal » 16 Aug 2012 09:26
by Seal » 16 Aug 2012 09:48
by Snowball » 16 Aug 2012 11:58
by Pepe the Horseman » 16 Aug 2012 11:59
by Seal » 16 Aug 2012 12:05
Snowball Heskey v Roberts
13,778 Minutes 210 Appearances 036 Goals - 20 Assists 383 mins/goal ROBERTS
36,674 Minutes 499 Appearances 105 Goals - 18 Assists 349 mins/goal HESKEY
by Snowball » 16 Aug 2012 12:24
SealSnowball Heskey v Roberts
13,778 Minutes 210 Appearances 036 Goals - 20 Assists 383 mins/goal ROBERTS
36,674 Minutes 499 Appearances 105 Goals - 18 Assists 349 mins/goal HESKEY
W-w-w-w-what!?
Are you trying to prove the 62 England caps Emily Heskey is better than 0 Caps Jason Roberts.
Thanks for clearing that one up.
by MouldyRoyal » 16 Aug 2012 12:37
by Snowball » 16 Aug 2012 12:59
MouldyRoyal So using your "major contribution" method would likely put Roberts on top?
by Seal » 16 Aug 2012 13:05
SnowballSealSnowball Heskey v Roberts
13,778 Minutes 210 Appearances 036 Goals - 20 Assists 383 mins/goal ROBERTS
36,674 Minutes 499 Appearances 105 Goals - 18 Assists 349 mins/goal HESKEY
W-w-w-w-what!?
Are you trying to prove the 62 England caps Emily Heskey is better than 0 Caps Jason Roberts.
Thanks for clearing that one up.
Not trying to "prove" anything. Just posting the facts. Use them any way you oxf*rd like including wiping your arse.
Heskey clearly a better goal-scorer than Roberts over his career. Surprised that Roberts' assists are about 3 times Heskey's though.
by Snowball » 16 Aug 2012 13:13
Seal
But why are you posting these facts? Who asked for a pointless comparison between Heskey & Roberts in any case?
I wouldn't waste the printing paper to wipe my arse with them xx
by Reading4eva » 16 Aug 2012 13:22
by JordCot » 16 Aug 2012 13:47
by Snowball » 16 Aug 2012 15:56
by Elm Park Pasty » 16 Aug 2012 16:10
Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 41 guests