by Big Foot » 02 Nov 2012 08:39
by royal67 » 02 Nov 2012 08:50
by Gordons Cumming » 02 Nov 2012 08:52
by PBR » 02 Nov 2012 09:07
by royal67 » 02 Nov 2012 09:22
Gordons Cumming :roll:
FFS
by sandman » 02 Nov 2012 09:49
PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
by Lovely hot donuts! » 02 Nov 2012 10:06
PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
by sandman » 02 Nov 2012 10:19
Lovely hot donuts!PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
Well that's total bollocks.
by Norfolk Royal » 02 Nov 2012 12:09
Lovely hot donuts!PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
Well that's total bollocks. Before Anton, JM was losing £4m a year to the club. i don't think anyone profits. And I really don't think you can be annoyed for not putting his entire wealth into the club, can you?
And, oh yeah, if the fans took over there would be NO MONEY that could be invested no matter weather it was actually invested!
by Divvy » 02 Nov 2012 12:15
Big Foot Murmurings abound...
by Jackson Corner » 02 Nov 2012 12:35
Norfolk RoyalLovely hot donuts!PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
Well that's total bollocks. Before Anton, JM was losing £4m a year to the club. i don't think anyone profits. And I really don't think you can be annoyed for not putting his entire wealth into the club, can you?
And, oh yeah, if the fans took over there would be NO MONEY that could be invested no matter weather it was actually invested!
That's not true actually. I have an endowment policy on a £40k mortgage maturing next April (expected to pay 28k) and I would be prepared to throw in ten per cent of that if the fans took over.
by Ian Royal » 02 Nov 2012 12:42
by Gordons Cumming » 02 Nov 2012 12:45
royal67Gordons Cumming :roll:
FFS
I take it that you feel my response to the OP wasn't valid then.....?? Thanks for your valuable input.
by maffff » 02 Nov 2012 12:48
Norfolk RoyalLovely hot donuts!PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
Well that's total bollocks. Before Anton, JM was losing £4m a year to the club. i don't think anyone profits. And I really don't think you can be annoyed for not putting his entire wealth into the club, can you?
And, oh yeah, if the fans took over there would be NO MONEY that could be invested no matter weather it was actually invested!
That's not true actually. I have an endowment policy on a £40k mortgage maturing next April (expected to pay 28k) and I would be prepared to throw in ten per cent of that if the fans took over.
Big Foot Murmurings abound of scant funds being available in January, minimal investment from a transfer fee perspective (although I acknowledge the wages element of the signings/signing on fees etc) and supposedly the club will be turning a profit come the end of the season.
Could we be sold? AZ etc would certainly turn a quick profit on the assumption that the club is worth a great deal more now than it was 12-14 months ago.
by Royal Bahamas » 02 Nov 2012 14:17
sandmanPBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.![]()
Yep, that'll work.
by melonhead » 02 Nov 2012 15:52
PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
by PBR » 02 Nov 2012 17:18
Lovely hot donuts!PBR How have we benefited from having Madejski and the russian guy in charge? never. Money goes in (their pockets) never comes out. I think it would be beneficial if we ditched the rich guys and let the fans lead the team.
Well that's total bollocks. Before Anton, JM was losing £4m a year to the club. i don't think anyone profits. And I really don't think you can be annoyed for not putting his entire wealth into the club, can you?
And, oh yeah, if the fans took over there would be NO MONEY that could be invested no matter weather it was actually invested!
by melonhead » 02 Nov 2012 17:57
by RoyalBlue » 03 Nov 2012 12:15
Ian Royal Bit tricky really, he could only sell his majority share holding of 51% at the moment because the remainder of the deal to take the rest hasn't gone through so it's Still Madejski's.
And with our relegation currently looking likely he wouldn't get a brilliant price. Although obviously still far superior to £13m. I'd expect Madejski to do his nut and resign as Chairman if this is on the cards though.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests