by Ian Royal »
29 Dec 2012 22:51
SCIAG No, that match was just impossible to referee.
If he was biased, he wouldn't have booked Tomkins for dissent, and wouldn't have allowed Hunt to keep the ball in the corner.
West Ham were going down at every opportunity, and there were a few off the ball incidents that you couldn't expect him to see. Oliver also couldn't be expected to know that West Ham were going to deliberately target Kebe, and then we didn't make it easy for him by protesting almost as furiously and exaggerating contact. If Oliver had given out too many cards, it would have fallen apart.
He didn't have a good game, but I think accusations of bias are unfounded- just an inexperienced ref backed up against the wall.
Sorry, but how exactly can the referee stop a player holding the ball in the corner? It's not illegal.
How could he have known they'd have targetted Kebe? Oh, I don't know, done some research first? Paid attention to the fact that they were targetting Kebe once the game started and they went straight in on him within the first couple of minutes?
I can accept he didn't see Cole lashing out at Gunter. I can't accept he didn't see Cole going through Kebe deliberately, because he was looking straight at it.