by moo » 13 Feb 2013 22:35
by ddetisi » 13 Feb 2013 22:53
moo Maybe McCarthy will chose the sensible option like Butland did...
by yappy » 13 Feb 2013 23:08
by jimstaaa » 13 Feb 2013 23:28
by Terminal Boardom » 14 Feb 2013 02:15
by cmonurz » 14 Feb 2013 13:00
by LoyalRoyalFan » 14 Feb 2013 15:29
by SCIAG » 14 Feb 2013 16:08
yappy Chelsea have Courtois so not really too sure why they would be in interested in AMc
by Royal Ginger » 14 Feb 2013 16:19
LoyalRoyalFan Sell Federici and replace him with McCarthy.
Better keeper.
Simple.
by JordCot » 14 Feb 2013 16:40
by Royal Ginger » 14 Feb 2013 22:23
JordCot Personally I don't understand this one. Obviously we know McCarthy is good because he is ours so we have paid attention to him but he can't be that well known? Butland was getting regular football before his england and olympic call ups and while McCarthy was good in his stint this season he wasn't SPECTACULAR and didn't have loads of games to show his quality. I can't see chelsea splashing big money on him, specially with the impressive looking Courtois
by JordCot » 15 Feb 2013 00:00
Royal GingerJordCot Personally I don't understand this one. Obviously we know McCarthy is good because he is ours so we have paid attention to him but he can't be that well known? Butland was getting regular football before his england and olympic call ups and while McCarthy was good in his stint this season he wasn't SPECTACULAR and didn't have loads of games to show his quality. I can't see chelsea splashing big money on him, specially with the impressive looking Courtois
He made headlines with his spectacular display against Swansea. That's what people would have seen. Also good last time he covered for Feds in the champ. I totally get it. Cech won't be around forever, and they'll still need 2 excellent keepers.
by Royal Ginger » 15 Feb 2013 07:54
JordCotRoyal GingerJordCot Personally I don't understand this one. Obviously we know McCarthy is good because he is ours so we have paid attention to him but he can't be that well known? Butland was getting regular football before his england and olympic call ups and while McCarthy was good in his stint this season he wasn't SPECTACULAR and didn't have loads of games to show his quality. I can't see chelsea splashing big money on him, specially with the impressive looking Courtois
He made headlines with his spectacular display against Swansea. That's what people would have seen. Also good last time he covered for Feds in the champ. I totally get it. Cech won't be around forever, and they'll still need 2 excellent keepers.
Yeah but Butlands been talk of the town for a while now, If McCarthy had played the whole season and impressed then maybe but I just think we see his achievements a little rose tinted. I doubt he has made much of an impact on many other clubs other than just a player with potential
by Cripple Creek » 15 Feb 2013 08:36
by melonhead » 15 Feb 2013 10:49
by SPARTA » 15 Feb 2013 17:55
moo It's the rumour going round, that they are going to be fighting Liverpool for him in the summer. This is allegedly because the Butland deal fell through when he chose Stoke ahead of them.
Maybe McCarthy will chose the sensible option like Butland did...
by Alexander Litvinenko » 19 Feb 2013 11:41
SPARTAmoo It's the rumour going round, that they are going to be fighting Liverpool for him in the summer. This is allegedly because the Butland deal fell through when he chose Stoke ahead of them.
Maybe McCarthy will chose the sensible option like Butland did...
It isn't McCarthy's decision to make! Hopefully we'll sell Federici and make McCarthy number one in any case. He wont be first choice at Chelsea or Liverpool.
by SPARTA » 19 Feb 2013 18:00
Alexander LitvinenkoSPARTAmoo It's the rumour going round, that they are going to be fighting Liverpool for him in the summer. This is allegedly because the Butland deal fell through when he chose Stoke ahead of them.
Maybe McCarthy will chose the sensible option like Butland did...
It isn't McCarthy's decision to make! Hopefully we'll sell Federici and make McCarthy number one in any case. He wont be first choice at Chelsea or Liverpool.
If there's an offer or offers that are above the agreed release clause in his contract, then it does become his choice.
by peterroyal76 » 19 Feb 2013 18:31
by Ian Royal » 19 Feb 2013 18:51
SPARTAAlexander LitvinenkoSPARTA
It isn't McCarthy's decision to make! Hopefully we'll sell Federici and make McCarthy number one in any case. He wont be first choice at Chelsea or Liverpool.
If there's an offer or offers that are above the agreed release clause in his contract, then it does become his choice.
Is there a release clause? Not every contract has one written in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests