by P!ssed Off »
05 Apr 2013 02:02
melonhead AkpansBFF Alexander Litvinenko Never mind the transfer budget? What about the wages budget?
Sign one player for £5M and pay them 50k a week on a 4-year contract and that's over half of your £30M budget gone.
I think they mean money to buy players wages not included
if i were a business man i would be budgetting for the entire package every time i bought a player.
signing on fee, plus wages for duration of contract.
Yes, but this would not be a
Summer transfer budget. What you're suggesting would be a budget lasting a period of many years.
If you managed a business that was set a year's budget of £30M then you would not say "but I must factor in the ten years after this", there will be another budget for each year in the ten years after your first budget.
For a player on a four-year contract:
The 1st year's wages affect the 1st year's budget.
The 2nd year's wages affect the 2nd year's budget.
The 3rd year's wages affect the 3rd year's budget.
The 4th year's wages affect the 4th year's budget.
Without wanting to sound patronising: I hope this clears up the misunderstanding.
Yes, Redknapp is an idiot but the bigger idiots are the Portsmouth owners that signed off on his transfer dealings. QPR is different in that their owners probably can afford to waste hundreds of millions per season.
TLDR: If Zingarevich gives Adkins a budget of £30 million for next season, then this money is the budget for
only next season, we do not have to attempt to preserve this money until the end of time.