by The Rouge » 01 Aug 2013 03:11
by urz13 » 01 Aug 2013 06:45
by southbank1871 » 01 Aug 2013 07:41
FridaysGhost Roberts has been a waste of space for a year and is now far too old and far to injured. He should not have been given a squad number. He says all the right things whilst sucking £20,000 a week out of RFC when he knows it is just his pension. Of course, we can't get rid of him - that would suddenly become racism!
by ayjaydee » 01 Aug 2013 08:48
by peterroyal76 » 01 Aug 2013 09:05
ayjaydee Has anyone considered that there is the teensiest possibility that football clubs have something called insurance and that the drain on the clubs resources may be nothing like the figures quoted on here? No, thought not.
by Fox Talbot » 01 Aug 2013 09:06
ayjaydee Has anyone considered that there is the teensiest possibility that football clubs have something called insurance and that the drain on the clubs resources may be nothing like the figures quoted on here? No, thought not.
by Royal Ginger » 01 Aug 2013 09:41
RoyalBlueRoyal Gingerblueroyals Why didn't the club put a clause in the clause that allowed him to extend his contract stating he could only do so if he wasn't injured.
Club have oxf*rd up on this one IMO
HR rules still apply. Fast track to tribunal if an illness/disability are the reason for a termination.
And what HR rules would those be? Some a bloke down the pub told you?! There are times when the law is an ass but it's not mad enough to insist that an employer continue to employ someone who is fundamentally incapable of performing a job that they were employed to do. Otherwise we might all be dodging blind bus drivers! An employer is expected to make reasonable adjustments if that would help the employee to undertake his/her job but I'm not sure allowing Roberts to take to the pitch in a wheel chair could be regarded as 'reasonable'!
by Broxroyal » 01 Aug 2013 12:16
by loyalroyal4life » 01 Aug 2013 12:25
by Gav » 01 Aug 2013 12:31
Fox Talbotayjaydee Has anyone considered that there is the teensiest possibility that football clubs have something called insurance and that the drain on the clubs resources may be nothing like the figures quoted on here? No, thought not.
It might be in the club's interest he never plays again and we claim a refund from whoever.
by Rollerbob » 01 Aug 2013 13:53
by Pepe the Horseman » 01 Aug 2013 13:58
by dogzbollox » 01 Aug 2013 18:26
Lacoste I don't care whether Roberts plays again or not, I want him to leave because I simply dont like him or what he says.
by Platypuss » 01 Aug 2013 18:40
by FridaysGhost » 03 Aug 2013 21:21
by scumbag » 03 Aug 2013 22:31
FridaysGhost If the Jason Roberts of four years ago suddenly appeared in the next few weeks and transformed our Forward options, no-one would be more happy than me. If the Robin Friday of many years ago suddenly appeared in the next few weeks and transformed our Forward options, I would be ecstatic. The first situation is as likely as the second and - Robin Friday died a long time ago.
Given our current formation and our current forwards, it is difficult to pick out Championship teams who have a worst attack than we do! If we got rid of The Pog and Roberts and replaced them with Rhodes and Austin (now too late), which RFC Fan would object! Also, if our scouting system is now so good, why haven't we already brought in a decent Striker?
by St. Brynjar » 04 Aug 2013 13:02
by glass half full » 04 Aug 2013 14:08
by sandman » 04 Aug 2013 14:37
St. Brynjar Can't believe all the Roberts hate. Without him we would have had no chance of promotion. When he played last season he was our best striker. Unlike Le Fondre and Pogrebnyak, he can actually do things with a football. I'd love to see him in our 4-2-3-1 system.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests