by Unbelievable Jeff » 31 Aug 2013 23:40
St. Brynjar Gunter - 8 - Thought he played excellently, including a double block and a few last ditch tackles. Frustrated at times but was generally very good.
by ayjaydee » 31 Aug 2013 23:43
by Millsy » 01 Sep 2013 00:04
by Barry the bird boggler » 01 Sep 2013 00:22
by Uke » 01 Sep 2013 00:25
Royal91M BrookWill95 What was with Yeovil's song before the game?
That was my highlight of the afternoon!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBBhisBJIUc
by Z175 » 01 Sep 2013 00:52
by St. Brynjar » 01 Sep 2013 01:02
Unbelievable JeffSt. Brynjar Gunter - 8 - Thought he played excellently, including a double block and a few last ditch tackles. Frustrated at times but was generally very good.
Really? I thought he had an absolute shocker.
Yes he made maybe 1 or 2 blocks, but he looked uneasy on the ball, couldn't pass for Sh*t and very lightweight
by AirRaidSiren » 01 Sep 2013 01:09
Z175 I wish I lived on Winchester Royal's planet happy but I can't feel happy from that performance. Yeovil haven't scored in four games, which is why we escaped, but it could have been another five or six. It's deluded to praise Yeovil and Peterborough (beaten deservedly two nil at home by Crawley today), both good teams but if you are getting battered by them, you are not aiming to be a premierleague club.
I'd be delighted with a hard fought win, but this was a fluke that we didn't get thrashed, for the second time. That's worrying from a defensive and morale point of view.
Yet the six nil obviously had a negative effect. Anyone saying we don't care about the cup is thinking from a fan's perspective. The players will have felt that result across the whole squad and then add in the sudden transfer demand from our longest serving outfield player and Adkins declaring he is bringing in three replacements, then I'm not surprised it was a subdued performance.
We should have been thrashed. But we werent, so morale takes a boost and we will improve. Am I happy, no, as we look a long way from top two. Satisfied? Absolutely!
by P!ssed Off » 01 Sep 2013 01:19
AirRaidSirenZ175 I wish I lived on Winchester Royal's planet happy but I can't feel happy from that performance. Yeovil haven't scored in four games, which is why we escaped, but it could have been another five or six. It's deluded to praise Yeovil and Peterborough (beaten deservedly two nil at home by Crawley today), both good teams but if you are getting battered by them, you are not aiming to be a premierleague club.
I'd be delighted with a hard fought win, but this was a fluke that we didn't get thrashed, for the second time. That's worrying from a defensive and morale point of view.
Yet the six nil obviously had a negative effect. Anyone saying we don't care about the cup is thinking from a fan's perspective. The players will have felt that result across the whole squad and then add in the sudden transfer demand from our longest serving outfield player and Adkins declaring he is bringing in three replacements, then I'm not surprised it was a subdued performance.
We should have been thrashed. But we werent, so morale takes a boost and we will improve. Am I happy, no, as we look a long way from top two. Satisfied? Absolutely!
There is no such thing as being 'lucky not to being thrashed' when it was 1-0. Were we unlucky 3-4+ on not conceding? And to say we should have been thrashed is utter bollocks. Then surely our defence and goalkeeper done well to NOT be thrashed???
by BenReadingFC » 01 Sep 2013 01:28
by AirRaidSiren » 01 Sep 2013 01:29
P!ssed OffAirRaidSirenZ175 I wish I lived on Winchester Royal's planet happy but I can't feel happy from that performance. Yeovil haven't scored in four games, which is why we escaped, but it could have been another five or six. It's deluded to praise Yeovil and Peterborough (beaten deservedly two nil at home by Crawley today), both good teams but if you are getting battered by them, you are not aiming to be a premierleague club.
I'd be delighted with a hard fought win, but this was a fluke that we didn't get thrashed, for the second time. That's worrying from a defensive and morale point of view.
Yet the six nil obviously had a negative effect. Anyone saying we don't care about the cup is thinking from a fan's perspective. The players will have felt that result across the whole squad and then add in the sudden transfer demand from our longest serving outfield player and Adkins declaring he is bringing in three replacements, then I'm not surprised it was a subdued performance.
We should have been thrashed. But we werent, so morale takes a boost and we will improve. Am I happy, no, as we look a long way from top two. Satisfied? Absolutely!
There is no such thing as being 'lucky not to being thrashed' when it was 1-0. Were we unlucky 3-4+ on not conceding? And to say we should have been thrashed is utter bollocks. Then surely our defence and goalkeeper done well to NOT be thrashed???
Defence (cbs in particular) was poor IMO.
Morrison's concentration was all over the place. I think it was twice he stopped running because he thought the ball was going out, only for it not to.
During one Yeovil attack, Morrison and Pearce were zigg-zagging all over the pitch I thought they would run in to each other.
Yeovil created enough clear cut chances to win comfortably (so no credit to the defence for stopping them from getting chances).
Credit to McCarthy for a few good saves, but we were lucky Madden was injured and that their strikers that did play were wasteful.
by St. Brynjar » 01 Sep 2013 01:50
No Fixed Abode Was in the home end. Was never a penalty. Reading were hopeless. Yeovil were better but hopeless in front of goal. Two relegation candidates from today's game.
by urz13 » 01 Sep 2013 01:52
by P!ssed Off » 01 Sep 2013 01:52
AirRaidSirenP!ssed OffAirRaidSiren There is no such thing as being 'lucky not to being thrashed' when it was 1-0. Were we unlucky 3-4+ on not conceding? And to say we should have been thrashed is utter bollocks. Then surely our defence and goalkeeper done well to NOT be thrashed???
Defence (cbs in particular) was poor IMO.
Morrison's concentration was all over the place. I think it was twice he stopped running because he thought the ball was going out, only for it not to.
During one Yeovil attack, Morrison and Pearce were zigg-zagging all over the pitch I thought they would run in to each other.
Yeovil created enough clear cut chances to win comfortably (so no credit to the defence for stopping them from getting chances).
Credit to McCarthy for a few good saves, but we were lucky Madden was injured and that their strikers that did play were wasteful.
Again, I'll reiterate..it wasn't luck that nearly stopped us from a 'thrashing'.
We we not lucky Madden was injured, because you could say they were lucky Kelly, McAnuff and Bridge were out..clutching at straws, eh?
by Royalee » 01 Sep 2013 01:56
by P!ssed Off » 01 Sep 2013 02:07
Royalee Not the greatest performance but a win.
Adkins' substitutions turned the game for all you f*ckwits slagging him off and 8 points from 5 against mostly too half sides is a good start given he's having to remould McDermott's shambles. Williams motm followed by Guthrie, Gunter appalling. I'd forgive Blackman for being so bad if he at least tried an inch.
It'll be interesting to see who we sign in the days ahead, pretty happy with some of the rumours.
I bet Dellor was jizzing his pants after the first half, by the way Tim, your best mates team lost today you bumbling cretin.
Ooooooooh Adam Le Foooooondre
by BenReadingFC » 01 Sep 2013 02:31
by Maguire » 01 Sep 2013 03:35
by Jackson Corner » 01 Sep 2013 03:37
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Armadillo Roadkill, From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Jammy Dodger, Orion1871 and 322 guests