There's a longer than usual statement on the STAR website about the ownership situation.
There's also a response from a STAR Board member to the comment thread on TTE on a similar subject.
starliaison wrote:There's a longer than usual statement on the STAR website about the ownership situation.
There's also a response from a STAR Board member to the comment thread on TTE on a similar subject.
www.star-reading.orgSutekh wrote:starliaison wrote:There's a longer than usual statement on the STAR website about the ownership situation.
There's also a response from a STAR Board member to the comment thread on TTE on a similar subject.
And the URL for the STAR site is.... ?
I find this extraordinary and don't really understand how this has happened - what have I missed? How can the club be worth so much less than this time last year?The combination of these two factors has led to a fall in the notional value of the club from (maybe) £25 million to (apparently) £1.
I presume the club has lost money during 2013-14 and its prospects are not as good as they were. These figures are cribbed - with caveats - from published material. It would appear that subsequent developments suggest £1 is an under-estimate.Green wrote:Interesting article, and fair play for giving frank views, something which I know STAR has been accused of not doing in the past.
I find this extraordinary and don't really understand how this has happened - what have I missed? How can the club be worth so much less than this time last year?The combination of these two factors has led to a fall in the notional value of the club from (maybe) £25 million to (apparently) £1.
And as fans should we really care? Ok STAR's nominal stake has decreased but that was never a financial investment really. SJM & AZ are the only ones facing a
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests