Pre-season friendlies 2014

250 posts
User avatar
Drew_3
Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 08:00

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Drew_3 » 02 Aug 2014 17:36

MmmMonsterMunch
bobby1413 What was the attendance like? Did Swansea bring many fans?


Think it was approx 5k in total... 1k of them Swans

Yeah that's probably about right though when there is that few there it actually looks like less!

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by LoyalRoyal22 » 02 Aug 2014 17:40

Sounds like Pearce & Morrison were poor. No surprise.. Playing them both together is a disaster. Lack of pace\confidence & passing ability in a team which will attempt to pass out from the back. This will be one frustrating season. Literally only positive is some of our academy prospects.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18965
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Pepe the Horseman » 02 Aug 2014 17:41

It's a shame that because of our midfield problems, Hector hasn't had a chance to prove himself as a cb. Sounds like Morrison and Pearce haven't exactly covered themselves in glory.

mambo3
Member
Posts: 411
Joined: 31 May 2011 21:18

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by mambo3 » 02 Aug 2014 17:49

winchester_royal
Drew_3 It was Pearce for the penalty, the most blatant handball I have seen for some time. Would definitely have walked in a league game, no way in pre-season. Though the ref did warn him

Well given all our players would get blown over by a stiff breeze we don't have the players to play a more direct game either

On what I've seen today Kuhl and Tanner should both be playing ahead of Hector and Edwards (sorry Pepe) next week


Are u a relative of Tanner?

User avatar
Drew_3
Member
Posts: 847
Joined: 06 Apr 2006 08:00

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Drew_3 » 02 Aug 2014 17:49

Pepe the Horseman It's a shame that because of our midfield problems, Hector hasn't had a chance to prove himself as a cb. Sounds like Morrison and Pearce haven't exactly covered themselves in glory.

Judging by today's performance and in the brief stint he had at the end of last season Hector could be the CB we need, comfortable with the ball at his feet and good passing ability. He doesn't look rushed when he has the ball but neither does he dwell on it either.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Ian Royal » 02 Aug 2014 17:55

No defence is going to be comfortable with a totally patchwork midfield ahead of it. The result pretty much as I'd expect with that sort of team, if not better. Nice to see Blackman put one away. That was a nice strike.

We may start slowly, but with the ownership getting sorted and possibly a few signings to come in, lets hope we don't let it hurt our confidence. It's not like starting badly in the Championship ever hurt McDermott's side. We can pick up from there when we start getting people back from injury and (hopefully) some signings bedded in.

Don't want too many new bodies though. One of the things to look forward to in this season of likely mid-table mediocrity is seeing more of the Academy players tested in the first team.

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12837
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by paultheroyal » 02 Aug 2014 17:59

Pearce and Morrisson looked subdued all game. Real can't be arsed about them. Hector needs to go centre back.

A midfield 5 of Edwards, Hector, Taylor, Blackman, Akpan should be playing against Newport County not Wigan. That's how much I fear for us in that game.

No service upfront and no real attacking intent.

A striker, an attacking midfielder and another winger an absolute priority this month.

Gut feeling also is that McCarthy is a goner. Feds will start on Saturday and McCarthy will be sold on.

cactuswood
Member
Posts: 9
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 19:11

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by cactuswood » 02 Aug 2014 18:02

Nice to see the Academy players come in, Kuhl's awareness and looking to play the ball forward was a breath of fresh air. Would like to see him given more chances early on.
Normal service from the catering team, bad beer and know idea what they were doing (Quote "never worked here before"), could be interesting with a large crowd.

Basingstoke Royal
Member
Posts: 659
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 13:34
Location: Basingstoke

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Basingstoke Royal » 02 Aug 2014 18:41

winchester_royal
Drew_3 It was Pearce for the penalty, the most blatant handball I have seen for some time. Would definitely have walked in a league game, no way in pre-season. Though the ref did warn him

Well given all our players would get blown over by a stiff breeze we don't have the players to play a more direct game either

On what I've seen today Kuhl and Tanner should both be playing ahead of Hector and Edwards (sorry Pepe) next week



Totally agree. Kuhl looked more hungry and better quality than most of the other players when he came on. Him and hector should start in centre mid.

We need obita on the left wing. He is wasted at left back and had no option down the line as Taylor is not a winger. Cummings and obita on left is a better combination than obita and taylor.

Tanner and pog as a little and large combination front in a 4-4-2

I would love hector to play centre back in place of either of the other two donkeys, but until Guthrie or Jem are back he will have to play centre midfield.


User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by winchester_royal » 02 Aug 2014 18:48

mambo3
winchester_royal
Drew_3 It was Pearce for the penalty, the most blatant handball I have seen for some time. Would definitely have walked in a league game, no way in pre-season. Though the ref did warn him

Well given all our players would get blown over by a stiff breeze we don't have the players to play a more direct game either

On what I've seen today Kuhl and Tanner should both be playing ahead of Hector and Edwards (sorry Pepe) next week


Are u a relative of Tanner?


No, I just thought Edwards looked like a little boy lost out there, whereas in his 10 minutes Tanner actually found space, turned, and played people in.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by winchester_royal » 02 Aug 2014 18:51

Drew_3
winchester_royal
Drew_3 It was Pearce for the penalty, the most blatant handball I have seen for some time. Would definitely have walked in a league game, no way in pre-season. Though the ref did warn him

Well given all our players would get blown over by a stiff breeze we don't have the players to play a more direct game either

On what I've seen today Kuhl and Tanner should both be playing ahead of Hector and Edwards (sorry Pepe) next week

That's a tad harsh Hector was our best player in terms of first touch and passing today, he also broke the play up nicely In front of the back four and was very disciplined in terms of his position which he needed to be given his role. I would agree Kuhl looks decent though and I would have him in the side for Taylor.

Not sure how you could have come to the conclusion of Tanner needing to start, granted Edwards didn't achieve alot although his work rate was good, but Tanner was only on for less than 10 mins was it?


Just don't think Hector is a midfielder, although what he did he did well...he wasn't doing the right things. He wasn't showing for the ball when necessary, he didn't know where to position himself in certain stages of the game, and that led to us losing the ball quite often and being broken at with ease. He'll be a fantastic defender, in fact I'd argue he should be playing at CB ahead of the two muppets we saw playing there today, but I thought the whole performance went up a good 20 notches with Kuhl and Tanner on the pitch.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22185
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Royal Rother » 02 Aug 2014 18:56

How many notches are available on your scale?

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by winchester_royal » 02 Aug 2014 18:57

Royal Rother How many notches are available on your scale?


10.


User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Simon's Church » 02 Aug 2014 19:06

winchester_royal
Drew_3
winchester_royal Well given all our players would get blown over by a stiff breeze we don't have the players to play a more direct game either

On what I've seen today Kuhl and Tanner should both be playing ahead of Hector and Edwards (sorry Pepe) next week

That's a tad harsh Hector was our best player in terms of first touch and passing today, he also broke the play up nicely In front of the back four and was very disciplined in terms of his position which he needed to be given his role. I would agree Kuhl looks decent though and I would have him in the side for Taylor.

Not sure how you could have come to the conclusion of Tanner needing to start, granted Edwards didn't achieve alot although his work rate was good, but Tanner was only on for less than 10 mins was it?


Just don't think Hector is a midfielder, although what he did he did well...he wasn't doing the right things. He wasn't showing for the ball when necessary, he didn't know where to position himself in certain stages of the game, and that led to us losing the ball quite often and being broken at with ease. He'll be a fantastic defender, in fact I'd argue he should be playing at CB ahead of the two muppets we saw playing there today, but I thought the whole performance went up a good 20 notches with Kuhl and Tanner on the pitch.


Why do you suppose big nige hasnt given them a huge amount of playing time in the first team this pre-season winch?

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Ian Royal » 02 Aug 2014 19:16

With Kuhl the answer must surely be that he thinks he needs more development time, having only started playing for the U21s last season(?) and us having far more options in midfield - even if half of them are injured. Tanner is the one I'm more baffled about given our massive dearth of attacking talent and him being older and more experienced.

Be interested in Winch's insight too though, seeing as he's been paying a lot of attention to them all.

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Simon's Church » 02 Aug 2014 19:32

Thanks ian

I guess at 18 kuhl doesnt need to be rushed but being picked behind akpan and a centre back doesnt bode too well for his first team prospects this season

P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by P!ssed Off » 02 Aug 2014 19:33

Because pre-season is about getting fit.
If Adkins had started an U21 instead of a 1st teamer then the 1st teamer would be unfit, or forced to go and play with the the U21s would become unhappy.

It's far easier for the players to stick by and large to their own sections during pre-season.

No point the likes of Akpan, Hector and Kuhl splitting game time for one spot in pre-season. Better to be able to choose from 3 ready players come first game of the season.

User avatar
yappy
Member
Posts: 719
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:56

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by yappy » 02 Aug 2014 19:39

winchester_royal Just don't think Hector is a midfielder, although what he did he did well...he wasn't doing the right things. He wasn't showing for the ball when necessary, he didn't know where to position himself in certain stages of the game, and that led to us losing the ball quite often and being broken at with ease. He'll be a fantastic defender, in fact I'd argue he should be playing at CB ahead of the two muppets we saw playing there today, but I thought the whole performance went up a good 20 notches with Kuhl and Tanner on the pitch.


Personally thought Hector was pretty good today. Do agree that he would be better of at centre half, however he contributed a lot more in midfield today than Akpan did. I would have Kuhl & Tanner in for Akpan & Edwards.

SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6517
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by SCIAG » 02 Aug 2014 19:46

The issue with Tanner is that he's lightweight. He's bulked up (well, that's probably just naturally growth) a lot in the past two years but he's still maybe a bit precocious.

PO is probably right on the money too, avoid marginalising senior players by playing them in matches that are "below" them.

I don't really understand using Edwards centrally and Taylor on the wing, but Edwards played centrally in Australia and Taylor has played wide before so it isn't totally crazy.

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: Pre-season friendlies 2014

by Simon's Church » 02 Aug 2014 19:49

P!ssed Off Because pre-season is about getting fit

Is it not also about integrating new players into the team developing partnerships and an understanding of each others game? Which, like fitness, is best done in match situations.

250 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 217 guests

It is currently 01 Jul 2025 19:59